On Thu, Oct 28, 2010 at 11:30:55AM +0200, Fabian Groffen wrote:
> On 28-10-2010 09:25:23 +, Samuli Suominen wrote:
> > ssuominen10/10/28 09:25:23
> >
> > Modified: aggregate-1.6.ebuild
> > Log:
> > qa
>
> I think it would be good practice if you would give a summary of
> what type of QA
On 20:54 Thu 28 Oct , Samuli Suominen wrote:
> On 10/28/2010 07:22 PM, Fabian Groffen wrote:
> > Your committing this way actually supports the thought that you have
> > something to hide, because you don't document what you did, and you
> > didn't update the ChangeLog reducing overal visibilit
Samuli Suominen said:
> On 10/28/2010 09:11 PM, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> > On Thu, Oct 28, 2010 at 10:20 AM, Samuli Suominen wrote:
> >> On 10/28/2010 12:30 PM, Fabian Groffen wrote:
> >>> On 28-10-2010 09:25:23 +, Samuli Suominen wrote:
> ssuominen10/10/28 09:25:23
>
> Modif
On 10/28/2010 09:11 PM, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 28, 2010 at 10:20 AM, Samuli Suominen wrote:
>> On 10/28/2010 12:30 PM, Fabian Groffen wrote:
>>> On 28-10-2010 09:25:23 +, Samuli Suominen wrote:
ssuominen10/10/28 09:25:23
Modified: aggregate-1.6.ebuild
Log:
>
On Thu, Oct 28, 2010 at 10:20 AM, Samuli Suominen wrote:
> On 10/28/2010 12:30 PM, Fabian Groffen wrote:
>> On 28-10-2010 09:25:23 +, Samuli Suominen wrote:
>>> ssuominen 10/10/28 09:25:23
>>>
>>> Modified: aggregate-1.6.ebuild
>>> Log:
>>> qa
>>
>> I think it would be good practice if you
On 10/28/2010 07:22 PM, Fabian Groffen wrote:
> On 28-10-2010 17:20:13 +0300, Samuli Suominen wrote:
>>> I think it would be good practice if you would give a summary of
>>> what type of QA you applied, even though for you it may be obvious.
>>> I just see lots of unnecessary changes that are appar
On 28-10-2010 17:20:13 +0300, Samuli Suominen wrote:
> > I think it would be good practice if you would give a summary of
> > what type of QA you applied, even though for you it may be obvious.
> > I just see lots of unnecessary changes that are apparently considered to
> > be justified by "QA".
>
On 10/28/2010 12:30 PM, Fabian Groffen wrote:
> On 28-10-2010 09:25:23 +, Samuli Suominen wrote:
>> ssuominen10/10/28 09:25:23
>>
>> Modified: aggregate-1.6.ebuild
>> Log:
>> qa
>
> I think it would be good practice if you would give a summary of
> what type of QA you applied, even thoug
Fabian Groffen posted on Thu, 28 Oct 2010 11:30:55 +0200 as excerpted:
> On 28-10-2010 09:25:23 +, Samuli Suominen wrote:
>> ssuominen10/10/28 09:25:23
>>
>> Modified: aggregate-1.6.ebuild Log:
>> qa
>
> I think it would be good practice if you would give a summary of what
> type of QA
On 28-10-2010 09:25:23 +, Samuli Suominen wrote:
> ssuominen10/10/28 09:25:23
>
> Modified: aggregate-1.6.ebuild
> Log:
> qa
I think it would be good practice if you would give a summary of
what type of QA you applied, even though for you it may be obvious.
I just see lots of unnecessar
10 matches
Mail list logo
