OK Virgil, Virgil Dupras <vdup...@gentoo.org> writes:
> Discussing this change on the list? I haven't touched the eclass, I > simply fixed the xmw-abandoned netsurf package which had been broken for > 3 months prior to that (and by broken, I don't mean only on Prefix. Why > talk about 1-1 features in those situations?). Fixing packages without > touching eclasses doesn't require gentoo-dev review. > > Also, netsurf doesn't have any prefix keyword. Some of the lower-level > libs have ~m68k-mint, but it isn't clear why because the only > non-netsurf revdep to those libs is net-libs/libwebsockets and it isn't > keyworded for prefix either. > > Please, open a ticket on the appropriate package with a description > of an actual breakage and I'll be deligthed to address it. Well, all in all, thank you for stepping up to take care of netsurf-buildsystem. You're good. Yours, Benda
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature