[gentoo-dev] Re: package.mask vs ~arch

2014-08-01 Thread Steven J. Long
On Sun, Jun 29, 2014 at 11:01:53PM -0500, William Hubbs wrote: On Sun, Jun 29, 2014 at 10:04:54AM -0400, Rich Freeman wrote: A package that hasn't been tested AT ALL doesn't belong in ~arch. Suppose the maintainer is unable to test some aspect of the package, or any aspect of the package?

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: package.mask vs ~arch

2014-08-01 Thread William Hubbs
On Fri, Aug 01, 2014 at 10:13:33AM +0100, Steven J. Long wrote: On Sun, Jun 29, 2014 at 11:01:53PM -0500, William Hubbs wrote: On Sun, Jun 29, 2014 at 10:04:54AM -0400, Rich Freeman wrote: A package that hasn't been tested AT ALL doesn't belong in ~arch. Suppose the maintainer is unable