Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: pkg_pretend USE validation and VALID_USE alternative

2010-03-31 Thread Paweł Hajdan, Jr.
On 3/31/10 1:04 PM, Ulrich Mueller wrote: > We already have enough issues with circular dependencies, and I'm > sceptical about adding additional failures on USE flag conflicts. > Display a warning, but don't error out. How about only allowing local USE flags to conflict? This also seems to be the

[gentoo-dev] Re: pkg_pretend USE validation and VALID_USE alternative

2010-03-31 Thread Brian Harring
On Wed, Mar 31, 2010 at 01:04:39PM +0200, Ulrich Mueller wrote: > We already have enough issues with circular dependencies, and I'm > sceptical about adding additional failures on USE flag conflicts. > Display a warning, but don't error out. Solve the cyclical dependency via breaking the use cycle

[gentoo-dev] Re: pkg_pretend USE validation and VALID_USE alternative

2010-03-31 Thread Ulrich Mueller
> On Wed, 31 Mar 2010, Brian Harring wrote: > Not just my proposal- council contradicted it via even letting > pkg_pretend into EAPI3 (now EAPI4): > http://www.mail-archive.com/gentoo-coun...@lists.gentoo.org/msg00493.html It says "displaying conflicting USE flags" which doesn't necessarily