[gentoo-dev] Re: portage reliance on GNU objcopy ownership perseverance behavior in strip

2021-02-09 Thread Fāng-ruì Sòng
(I replied via https://groups.google.com/g/linux.gentoo.dev/c/WG-OLQe3yng "Reply all" (which only replied to the list AFAICT) but I did not subscribe to gentoo-dev via the official https://www.gentoo.org/get-involved/mailing-lists/ so my reply is missing) On Thu, Feb 4, 2021 at 4:09 PM Manoj Gupta

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: portage reliance on GNU objcopy ownership perseverance behavior in strip

2021-02-09 Thread Manoj Gupta
On Tue, Feb 9, 2021 at 8:44 PM Michael Orlitzky wrote: > On Tue, 2021-02-09 at 21:44 -0500, Michael Orlitzky wrote: > > > > ... games-arcade/xboing are also suspect. > > > > (This one's fine, that's the documented way to do things now. Although > I don't see why we couldn't use a separate group f

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: portage reliance on GNU objcopy ownership perseverance behavior in strip

2021-02-09 Thread Michael Orlitzky
On Tue, 2021-02-09 at 21:44 -0500, Michael Orlitzky wrote: > > ... games-arcade/xboing are also suspect. > (This one's fine, that's the documented way to do things now. Although I don't see why we couldn't use a separate group for each game's score file.)

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: portage reliance on GNU objcopy ownership perseverance behavior in strip

2021-02-09 Thread Michael Orlitzky
On Tue, 2021-02-09 at 18:25 -0800, Manoj Gupta wrote: > > > > Root is the owner but often there is also a group that has access to the > files. > After stripping with llvm-strip, new ownership is root:root instead of > root:. > Therefore, the members of the group lose access to the files post stri

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: portage reliance on GNU objcopy ownership perseverance behavior in strip

2021-02-09 Thread Fangrui Song
On 2021-02-09, Michael Orlitzky wrote: On Tue, 2021-02-09 at 17:53 -0800, Fāng-ruì Sòng wrote: (I replied via https://groups.google.com/g/linux.gentoo.dev/c/WG-OLQe3yng "Reply all" (which only replied to the list AFAICT) but I did not subscribe to gentoo-dev via the official https://www.gentoo.o

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: portage reliance on GNU objcopy ownership perseverance behavior in strip

2021-02-09 Thread Manoj Gupta
On Tue, Feb 9, 2021 at 6:02 PM Michael Orlitzky wrote: > On Tue, 2021-02-09 at 17:53 -0800, Fāng-ruì Sòng wrote: > > (I replied via > https://groups.google.com/g/linux.gentoo.dev/c/WG-OLQe3yng > > "Reply all" (which only replied to the list AFAICT) but I did not > > subscribe to gentoo-dev via th

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: portage reliance on GNU objcopy ownership perseverance behavior in strip

2021-02-09 Thread Michael Orlitzky
On Tue, 2021-02-09 at 17:53 -0800, Fāng-ruì Sòng wrote: > (I replied via https://groups.google.com/g/linux.gentoo.dev/c/WG-OLQe3yng > "Reply all" (which only replied to the list AFAICT) but I did not > subscribe to gentoo-dev via the official > https://www.gentoo.org/get-involved/mailing-lists/ so