-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Marius Mauch wrote:
So what you want is a USE_EXPAND version that only allows one value
per variable. That wouldn't be terribly difficult to do.
I extremely dislike that characterization. What I want is use flags with more
than two possible values.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Marius Mauch wrote:
Marijn Schouten (hkBst) [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
I imagine there are a lot more cases where the simple on/off
system we have now is suboptimal. I could be wrong of course.
Please comment.
This key=value systems sounds interesting.
Marijn Schouten (hkBst) wrote:
Marius Mauch wrote:
We already have this with USE_EXPAND. Not exactly the same syntax, but
I don't see a terrible problem in that, and we don't have to fix all
three trillion related tools to handle it. Unless you can come up
with a case that can't be handled
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Ryan Hill wrote:
Marijn Schouten (hkBst) wrote:
Marius Mauch wrote:
We already have this with USE_EXPAND. Not exactly the same syntax, but
I don't see a terrible problem in that, and we don't have to fix all
three trillion related tools to
On Mon, 08 Oct 2007 13:45:04 +0200
Marijn Schouten (hkBst) [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Marius Mauch wrote:
Marijn Schouten (hkBst) [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
I imagine there are a lot more cases where the simple on/off
system we have now is
Marijn Schouten (hkBst) [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
I imagine there are a lot more cases where the simple on/off system
we have now is suboptimal. I could be wrong of course. Please comment.
This key=value systems sounds interesting. Another use could be the
choice between xulrunner, seamonkey,
Hi!
On Sun, 07 Oct 2007, Christian Faulhammer wrote:
Marijn Schouten (hkBst) [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
I imagine there are a lot more cases where the simple on/off system
we have now is suboptimal. I could be wrong of course. Please comment.
This key=value systems sounds interesting. Another
Tobias Klausmann wrote:
For those apps that need an editor, one could think of editor=vim.
USE flag change usually triggers a rebuild of the package in question. I
certainly don't want to rebuild packages just because I switch $EDITOR.
Cheers,
-jkt
--
cd /local/pub more beer /dev/mouth
On Sun, 7 Oct 2007 21:12:25 +0200
Tobias Klausmann [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi!
On Sun, 07 Oct 2007, Christian Faulhammer wrote:
Marijn Schouten (hkBst) [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
I imagine there are a lot more cases where the simple on/off
system we have now is suboptimal. I could be
Jan Kundr?t [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Tobias Klausmann wrote:
For those apps that need an editor, one could think of editor=vim.
USE flag change usually triggers a rebuild of the package in question. I
certainly don't want to rebuild packages just because I switch $EDITOR.
If there's a
10 matches
Mail list logo
