On 10/04/2010 12:50 AM, Michael Haubenwallner wrote:
>
> On 09/30/2010 09:36 AM, Andreas K. Huettel wrote:
>> as I've only recently "graduated to developer", I've got a question about
>> this. Diego, your request makes perfect sense to me. But, so far I always
>> thought "Python, portage, and gc
On 10/04/2010 08:45 AM, Fabio Erculiani wrote:
> Am I the only one who is waiting for a Portage 2.2 unmask on ~arch?
> It's taking months if not years ;-)
Well, portage-2.1.9.x is essentially the same codebase as "portage-2.2".
If you look at the 2.1.9 branch, you can see that it diverges and at t
Am I the only one who is waiting for a Portage 2.2 unmask on ~arch?
It's taking months if not years ;-)
--
Fabio Erculiani
On 10/04/2010 03:50 AM, Michael Haubenwallner wrote:
> So - would it make sense to split repoman into its own ebuild?
++
I always did wonder why the two have been part of the same project.
Repoman updates could probably be stabilized more quickly with so much
worry about impact on users at large.
On 09/30/2010 09:36 AM, Andreas K. Huettel wrote:
> as I've only recently "graduated to developer", I've got a question about
> this. Diego, your request makes perfect sense to me. But, so far I always
> thought "Python, portage, and gcc are the things that I really need to rely
> on, so whatev
On 09/30/2010 06:25 PM, Zac Medico wrote:
> On 09/30/2010 12:41 AM, Dirkjan Ochtman wrote:
>> As another dev who generally runs stable (except things that I hack
>> on), another question: is it actually possible, as Diego seems to
>> suggest, to have two portages installed?
>
> You can run portage
El jue, 30-09-2010 a las 08:19 -0700, Zac Medico escribió:
> If we don't find any really annoying regressions in portage-2.1.9.12
> then that release will be stabilized about 30 days from now. We
> haven't been finding many regressions lately [1], so there's a
> reasonable probability of this relea
On 09/30/2010 12:41 AM, Dirkjan Ochtman wrote:
> As another dev who generally runs stable (except things that I hack
> on), another question: is it actually possible, as Diego seems to
> suggest, to have two portages installed?
You can run portage directly from a checkout if you export modified
ve
On 09/30/2010 01:09 AM, Pacho Ramos wrote:
> And I would also ask, Where a portage-2.1.9 version will be stabilized?
>
> Thanks a lot for the info :-)
If we don't find any really annoying regressions in portage-2.1.9.12
then that release will be stabilized about 30 days from now. We
haven't been
On Thu, Sep 30, 2010 at 09:36:44AM +0200, Andreas K. Huettel wrote:
> Hi,
>
> as I've only recently "graduated to developer", I've got a question about
> this. Diego, your request makes perfect sense to me. But, so far I always
> thought "Python, portage, and gcc are the things that I really ne
El jue, 30-09-2010 a las 10:09 +0200, Pacho Ramos escribió:
> And I would also ask, Where a portage-2.1.9 version will be stabilized?
>
> Thanks a lot for the info :-)
Where -> When
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
El jue, 30-09-2010 a las 09:41 +0200, Dirkjan Ochtman escribió:
> On Thu, Sep 30, 2010 at 09:36, Andreas K. Huettel
> wrote:
> > What is the general opinion on this?
> > Do you (developers) all use ~arch portage?
> > How big is the risk?
>
> As another dev who generally runs stable (except thing
On Thu, Sep 30, 2010 at 09:36, Andreas K. Huettel wrote:
> What is the general opinion on this?
> Do you (developers) all use ~arch portage?
> How big is the risk?
As another dev who generally runs stable (except things that I hack
on), another question: is it actually possible, as Diego seems to
On Thu, 30 Sep 2010 09:36:44 +0200
"Andreas K. Huettel" wrote:
> How big is the risk?
Portage was broken several times but it's always easy to fix. If you're
lazy, keep working .tbz2 nearby and unpack it to / whenever necessary.
If you're not, you can always run portage from the unpacked sources
Hi,
as I've only recently "graduated to developer", I've got a question about
this. Diego, your request makes perfect sense to me. But, so far I always
thought "Python, portage, and gcc are the things that I really need to rely
on, so whatever I do, I'll keep those stable."
(My development ma
Hi all,
I would like to beg all developers to keep around a copy of latest
Portage (2.1.9 or even 2.2) to use for committing to main tree. Reason
being that if we add more errors to be reported, using the old stable
version will still ignore the error cases, and allow broken ebuilds to
pass throug
16 matches
Mail list logo
