Re: [gentoo-dev] Repo mirror & CI project news: 'stable' gentoo branch, new repo stats, faster CI

2016-06-05 Thread Daniel Campbell
On 06/05/2016 02:05 PM, james wrote: > On 06/05/2016 12:15 PM, Daniel Campbell (zlg) wrote: >> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- >> Hash: SHA512 >> >> On June 5, 2016 9:04:26 AM PDT, "Michał Górny" wrote: >>> Hello, everyone. >>> >>> I have the pleasure to announce that a few

Re: [gentoo-dev] Repo mirror & CI project news: 'stable' gentoo branch, new repo stats, faster CI

2016-06-05 Thread james
On 06/05/2016 12:15 PM, Daniel Campbell (zlg) wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 On June 5, 2016 9:04:26 AM PDT, "Michał Górny" wrote: Hello, everyone. I have the pleasure to announce that a few improvements have been deployed by the Repository mirror &

Re: [gentoo-dev] Repo mirror & CI project news: 'stable' gentoo branch, new repo stats, faster CI

2016-06-05 Thread Kent Fredric
On 6 June 2016 at 05:34, rindeal wrote: > efore merging to master they do a rebase+force push, > let the CI check it, and if it passes they're allowed to merge it. No > cherry-picking involved. Master is then always clean and happy. I'm > not sure how well it scales, but

Re: [gentoo-dev] Repo mirror & CI project news: 'stable' gentoo branch, new repo stats, faster CI

2016-06-05 Thread rindeal
On 5 June 2016 at 19:13, Kent Fredric wrote: > On 6 June 2016 at 05:09, rindeal wrote: >> It is not, unless CI filters the broken commits in some miraculous >> way. With the current approach, both stable and master branch will >> contain the

Re: [gentoo-dev] Repo mirror & CI project news: 'stable' gentoo branch, new repo stats, faster CI

2016-06-05 Thread Daniel Campbell (zlg)
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 On June 5, 2016 9:04:26 AM PDT, "Michał Górny" wrote: >Hello, everyone. > >I have the pleasure to announce that a few improvements have been >deployed by the Repository mirror & CI project today. > > >1. The mirror for 'gentoo'

Re: [gentoo-dev] Repo mirror & CI project news: 'stable' gentoo branch, new repo stats, faster CI

2016-06-05 Thread Kent Fredric
On 6 June 2016 at 05:09, rindeal wrote: > It is not, unless CI filters the broken commits in some miraculous > way. With the current approach, both stable and master branch will > contain the pollution of broken commits + their fixes, instead of > having good commits only.

Re: [gentoo-dev] Repo mirror & CI project news: 'stable' gentoo branch, new repo stats, faster CI

2016-06-05 Thread M. J. Everitt
On 05/06/16 18:09, rindeal wrote: > On 5 June 2016 at 18:53, M. J. Everitt wrote: >> On 05/06/16 17:49, rindeal wrote: >>> On 5 June 2016 at 18:40, Kent Fredric wrote: On 6 June 2016 at 04:31, rindeal wrote: > Isn't no

Re: [gentoo-dev] Repo mirror & CI project news: 'stable' gentoo branch, new repo stats, faster CI

2016-06-05 Thread rindeal
On 5 June 2016 at 18:53, M. J. Everitt wrote: > On 05/06/16 17:49, rindeal wrote: >> On 5 June 2016 at 18:40, Kent Fredric wrote: >>> On 6 June 2016 at 04:31, rindeal wrote: Isn't no commit approach better than having

Re: [gentoo-dev] Repo mirror & CI project news: 'stable' gentoo branch, new repo stats, faster CI

2016-06-05 Thread Kent Fredric
On 6 June 2016 at 04:49, rindeal wrote: > I'd like to see the master branch free of commits which do not pass > CI, instead of having broken commits and holding master back until > revert commits are introduced. Just pretend "stable" is called "master" and pretend

Re: [gentoo-dev] Repo mirror & CI project news: 'stable' gentoo branch, new repo stats, faster CI

2016-06-05 Thread rindeal
On 5 June 2016 at 18:40, Kent Fredric wrote: > On 6 June 2016 at 04:31, rindeal wrote: >> Isn't no commit approach better than having broken commit + revert >> commit? > > > Huh? > > Its doing "replicate to github on pass using a merge commit". I'd

Re: [gentoo-dev] Repo mirror & CI project news: 'stable' gentoo branch, new repo stats, faster CI

2016-06-05 Thread Kent Fredric
On 6 June 2016 at 04:31, rindeal wrote: > Isn't no commit approach better than having broken commit + revert > commit? Huh? Its doing "replicate to github on pass using a merge commit". -- Kent KENTNL - https://metacpan.org/author/KENTNL

Re: [gentoo-dev] Repo mirror & CI project news: 'stable' gentoo branch, new repo stats, faster CI

2016-06-05 Thread rindeal
On 5 June 2016 at 18:04, Michał Górny wrote: > Hello, everyone. > > I have the pleasure to announce that a few improvements have been > deployed by the Repository mirror & CI project today. > > > 1. The mirror for 'gentoo' repository [1] now has a default 'stable' > branch. It

[gentoo-dev] Repo mirror & CI project news: 'stable' gentoo branch, new repo stats, faster CI

2016-06-05 Thread Michał Górny
Hello, everyone. I have the pleasure to announce that a few improvements have been deployed by the Repository mirror & CI project today. 1. The mirror for 'gentoo' repository [1] now has a default 'stable' branch. It is updated automatically by the gentoo-ci checker, and therefore always