Re: [gentoo-dev] Rethinking multilib flags in Gentoo

2019-05-09 Thread Alexis Ballier
On Wed, 8 May 2019 11:08:47 -0700 Matt Turner wrote: > On Wed, May 8, 2019 at 3:19 AM Alexis Ballier > wrote: > > > > On Wed, 08 May 2019 12:01:21 +0200 > > Michał Górny wrote: > > > > > On Wed, 2019-05-08 at 11:54 +0200, Alexis Ballier wrote: > > > > On Wed, 08 May 2019 11:41:41 +0200 > > > >

Re: [gentoo-dev] Rethinking multilib flags in Gentoo

2019-05-08 Thread Matt Turner
On Wed, May 8, 2019 at 3:19 AM Alexis Ballier wrote: > > On Wed, 08 May 2019 12:01:21 +0200 > Michał Górny wrote: > > > On Wed, 2019-05-08 at 11:54 +0200, Alexis Ballier wrote: > > > On Wed, 08 May 2019 11:41:41 +0200 > > > Michał Górny wrote: > > > > > > > > There's multilib that adds a lot of

Re: [gentoo-dev] Rethinking multilib flags in Gentoo

2019-05-08 Thread Alexis Ballier
On Wed, 08 May 2019 12:31:47 +0200 Michał Górny wrote: > On Wed, 2019-05-08 at 12:19 +0200, Alexis Ballier wrote: > > On Wed, 08 May 2019 12:01:21 +0200 > > Michał Górny wrote: > > > > > On Wed, 2019-05-08 at 11:54 +0200, Alexis Ballier wrote: > > > > On Wed, 08 May 2019 11:41:41 +0200 > > > >

Re: [gentoo-dev] Rethinking multilib flags in Gentoo

2019-05-08 Thread Michał Górny
On Wed, 2019-05-08 at 12:19 +0200, Alexis Ballier wrote: > On Wed, 08 May 2019 12:01:21 +0200 > Michał Górny wrote: > > > On Wed, 2019-05-08 at 11:54 +0200, Alexis Ballier wrote: > > > On Wed, 08 May 2019 11:41:41 +0200 > > > Michał Górny wrote: > > > > > > > > There's multilib that adds a lot

Re: [gentoo-dev] Rethinking multilib flags in Gentoo

2019-05-08 Thread Alexis Ballier
On Wed, 08 May 2019 12:01:21 +0200 Michał Górny wrote: > On Wed, 2019-05-08 at 11:54 +0200, Alexis Ballier wrote: > > On Wed, 08 May 2019 11:41:41 +0200 > > Michał Górny wrote: > > > > > > There's multilib that adds a lot of flags with a single eclass > > > > change, but I'd guess the number of

Re: [gentoo-dev] Rethinking multilib flags in Gentoo

2019-05-08 Thread Michał Górny
On Wed, 2019-05-08 at 11:54 +0200, Alexis Ballier wrote: > On Wed, 08 May 2019 11:41:41 +0200 > Michał Górny wrote: > > > > There's multilib that adds a lot of flags with a single eclass > > > change, but I'd guess the number of packages and flags is > > > constantly growing, so sooner or later y

Re: [gentoo-dev] Rethinking multilib flags in Gentoo

2019-05-08 Thread Alexis Ballier
On Wed, 08 May 2019 11:41:41 +0200 Michał Górny wrote: > > There's multilib that adds a lot of flags with a single eclass > > change, but I'd guess the number of packages and flags is > > constantly growing, so sooner or later you'll be hit by this again > > and no multilib killing will help you

Re: [gentoo-dev] Rethinking multilib flags in Gentoo

2019-05-08 Thread Michał Górny
On Wed, 2019-05-08 at 11:29 +0200, Alexis Ballier wrote: > On Tue, 07 May 2019 23:47:30 +0200 > Michał Górny wrote: > > > While the large number of flags is practically invisible to user with > > all the USE_EXPAND hiding, it negatively impacts pkgcheck. When > > the number reached 10, CI became

Re: [gentoo-dev] Rethinking multilib flags in Gentoo

2019-05-08 Thread Alexis Ballier
On Tue, 07 May 2019 23:47:30 +0200 Michał Górny wrote: > While the large number of flags is practically invisible to user with > all the USE_EXPAND hiding, it negatively impacts pkgcheck. When > the number reached 10, CI became unusable. We're currently back down > to 8, thanks to powerpc team,

[gentoo-dev] Rethinking multilib flags in Gentoo

2019-05-07 Thread Michał Górny
Hiya. So far we reached 5 arches having multilib flags: x86, mips, ppc, riscv, s390 (note: ppc just retracted their multilib support but I've left it commented out for further consideration). Of those, only x86, mips and riscv actually ever had multilib profiles. In other words, the ABI flags fo