Re: [gentoo-dev] SATA disk slower as /dev/sda then as in /dev/hda

2006-06-07 Thread Daniel Drake
Mivz wrote: /dev/sda: Timing cached reads: 1424 MB in 2.00 seconds = 711.96 MB/sec HDIO_DRIVE_CMD(null) (wait for flush complete) failed: Inappropriate ioctl for device Timing buffered disk reads: 114 MB in 3.00 seconds = 37.95 MB/sec HDIO_DRIVE_CMD(null) (wait for flush complete) failed:

Re: [gentoo-dev] SATA disk slower as /dev/sda then as in /dev/hda

2006-06-07 Thread Greg KH
On Wed, Jun 07, 2006 at 10:07:07PM +0200, Mivz wrote: > Why is it that when I use the new kernel SATA drivers and load is as > /dev/sda it is slower as with the old IDE drivers? You didn't tell us which sata drivers you were using, nor what kernel version. Either way, try asking this on the linux

[gentoo-dev] SATA disk slower as /dev/sda then as in /dev/hda

2006-06-07 Thread Mivz
Hello, I have a Intel SATA controler in my laptop and it is adressed as /dev/sda. My cdrom is /dev/hdc. My cdrom drive I can configure with hdparm to use dma and 32-bit io and it has a nice speed: /dev/hdc: Timing cached reads: 1408 MB in 2.00 seconds = 702.55 MB/sec Timing buffered disk read