> On Sun, 16 Feb 2014, Samuli Suominen wrote:
> wasn't the whole argument for not allowing binary files in tree the
> problems it causes w/ version control history, web interface, and
> such? then, what problems does .xpm or .svg cause? none, far as I
> know, so why disallow them?
That seems
On 13/02/14 17:12, Ulrich Mueller wrote:
> When rewriting the script scanning for binary files in the Portage
> tree [1], I noticed that there are some 25 XPM and SVG image files,
> with sizes up to 13 kB.
>
> For the time being, I've added exceptions for MIME types image/svg+xml
> and image/x-xpm
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On 13/02/14 16:12, Ulrich Mueller wrote:
> Should we allow pictures if the image file format is a text file?
Rather than having a hard rule for allowing or disallowing image
files, we should evaluate the intention of a file. If it make sense to
edit
> "JAD" == Jason A Donenfeld writes:
UM>> Should we allow pictures if the image file format is a text file?
JAD> I think we should not. Even if you can open it in a text editor,
JAD> you can't "read" it or interact with it in the same way that you
JAD> can a text-based patch.
That's not tru
On Thu, Feb 13, 2014 at 10:30 AM, Kent Fredric wrote:
>
> On 14 February 2014 04:28, Anthony G. Basile wrote:
>>
>> 2) You want your vcs to show the diff in that file and you can make sense
>> of that diff.
>
>
> Though how many of them are "well formatted" SVGs, and how many of them are
> singl
On 14 February 2014 04:28, Anthony G. Basile wrote:
> 2) You want your vcs to show the diff in that file and you can make sense
> of that diff.
>
Though how many of them are "well formatted" SVGs, and how many of them are
single-line SVG files without whitespace, such as linefeeds and
appropria
On 02/13/2014 10:24 AM, Jason A. Donenfeld wrote:
On Thu, Feb 13, 2014 at 4:12 PM, Ulrich Mueller wrote:
Should we allow pictures if the image file format is a text file?
I think we should not. Even if you can open it in a text editor, you
can't "read" it or interact with it in the same way th
On Thu, Feb 13, 2014 at 4:12 PM, Ulrich Mueller wrote:
> Should we allow pictures if the image file format is a text file?
I think we should not. Even if you can open it in a text editor, you
can't "read" it or interact with it in the same way that you can a
text-based patch. For that reason, big
On 02/13/2014 10:12 AM, Ulrich Mueller wrote:
When rewriting the script scanning for binary files in the Portage
tree [1], I noticed that there are some 25 XPM and SVG image files,
with sizes up to 13 kB.
For the time being, I've added exceptions for MIME types image/svg+xml
and image/x-xpmi [2]
When rewriting the script scanning for binary files in the Portage
tree [1], I noticed that there are some 25 XPM and SVG image files,
with sizes up to 13 kB.
For the time being, I've added exceptions for MIME types image/svg+xml
and image/x-xpmi [2], but I think it would be better to clarify our
10 matches
Mail list logo
