[gentoo-dev] Small change for epatch_user() in eutils.eclass

2012-01-29 Thread Ulrich Mueller
epatch_user() currently looks into CATEGORY/PF|P|PN subdirectories
of /etc/portage/patches. If the package has no revision, then PF and P
are identical, so there's no way to specify that a patch should only
apply to -r0.

The patch below changes ${PF} to ${P}-${PR}. Behaviour should be
identical for all non-zero revisions. For -r0 it will look in ${P}-r0
first, then in ${P} and ${PN}, as before.

--- eutils.eclass   3 Jan 2012 08:45:36 -   1.377
+++ eutils.eclass   29 Jan 2012 11:00:15 -
@@ -544,7 +544,7 @@
 
# don't clobber any EPATCH vars that the parent might want
local EPATCH_SOURCE check 
base=${PORTAGE_CONFIGROOT%/}/etc/portage/patches
-   for check in {${CATEGORY}/${PF},${CATEGORY}/${P},${CATEGORY}/${PN}}; do
+   for check in ${CATEGORY}/{${P}-${PR},${P},${PN}}; do
EPATCH_SOURCE=${base}/${CTARGET}/${check}
[[ -r ${EPATCH_SOURCE} ]] || 
EPATCH_SOURCE=${base}/${CHOST}/${check}
[[ -r ${EPATCH_SOURCE} ]] || EPATCH_SOURCE=${base}/${check}



Re: [gentoo-dev] Small change for epatch_user() in eutils.eclass

2012-01-29 Thread Mike Frysinger
On Sunday 29 January 2012 06:22:02 Ulrich Mueller wrote:
 epatch_user() currently looks into CATEGORY/PF|P|PN subdirectories
 of /etc/portage/patches. If the package has no revision, then PF and P
 are identical, so there's no way to specify that a patch should only
 apply to -r0.
 
 The patch below changes ${PF} to ${P}-${PR}. Behaviour should be
 identical for all non-zero revisions. For -r0 it will look in ${P}-r0
 first, then in ${P} and ${PN}, as before.

looks fine.  gogogogogogogogo.
-mike


signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.