Re: [gentoo-dev] So now that we have --quiet-build as default, can we talk about a forced LC_ALL=C again?

2011-12-07 Thread Mike Frysinger
On Sunday 04 December 2011 06:58:06 Chí-Thanh Christopher Nguyễn wrote: > Mike Frysinger schrieb: > > and in reality, you're complaining only about LC_MESSAGES, not LC_ALL or > > any other locale category ... > > I too think it is sufficient to have > LC_MESSAGES=C > in the default make.conf (or s

Re: [gentoo-dev] So now that we have --quiet-build as default, can we talk about a forced LC_ALL=C again?

2011-12-07 Thread Zac Medico
On 12/04/2011 03:58 AM, Chí-Thanh Christopher Nguyễn wrote: > Mike Frysinger schrieb: >> and in reality, you're complaining only about LC_MESSAGES, not LC_ALL or any >> other locale category ... > > I too think it is sufficient to have > LC_MESSAGES=C > in the default make.conf (or somewhere else

Re: [gentoo-dev] So now that we have --quiet-build as default, can we talk about a forced LC_ALL=C again?

2011-12-04 Thread Mike Frysinger
On Sunday 04 December 2011 12:37:15 James Cloos wrote: > As someone who leaves root w/o LANG, I would note that there are a few > packages which cannot build unless LANG is set to a UTF-8 locale. file a bug then > What we really need is C.UTF-8 and/or POSIX.UTF-8, and to force *that* > in emerge(

Re: [gentoo-dev] So now that we have --quiet-build as default, can we talk about a forced LC_ALL=C again?

2011-12-04 Thread James Cloos
As someone who leaves root w/o LANG, I would note that there are a few packages which cannot build unless LANG is set to a UTF-8 locale. What we really need is C.UTF-8 and/or POSIX.UTF-8, and to force *that* in emerge(1), ebuild(1), etc. -JimC -- James Cloos OpenPGP: 1024D/ED7DAEA6

Re: [gentoo-dev] So now that we have --quiet-build as default, can we talk about a forced LC_ALL=C again?

2011-12-04 Thread Paweł Hajdan, Jr.
On 12/4/11 12:58 PM, Chí-Thanh Christopher Nguyễn wrote: > Mike Frysinger schrieb: >> and in reality, you're complaining only about LC_MESSAGES, not LC_ALL or any >> other locale category ... > > I too think it is sufficient to have > LC_MESSAGES=C > in the default make.conf (or somewhere else wh

Re: [gentoo-dev] So now that we have --quiet-build as default, can we talk about a forced LC_ALL=C again?

2011-12-04 Thread Rich Freeman
2011/12/4 Chí-Thanh Christopher Nguyễn : > I too think it is sufficient to have > LC_MESSAGES=C > in the default make.conf (or somewhere else where the user can easily > change it), with a comment to leave it like this for build.log when > reporting bugs. ++ Or if that goes too far have it commen

Re: [gentoo-dev] So now that we have --quiet-build as default, can we talk about a forced LC_ALL=C again?

2011-12-04 Thread Chí-Thanh Christopher Nguyễn
Mike Frysinger schrieb: > and in reality, you're complaining only about LC_MESSAGES, not LC_ALL or any > other locale category ... I too think it is sufficient to have LC_MESSAGES=C in the default make.conf (or somewhere else where the user can easily change it), with a comment to leave it like t

Re: [gentoo-dev] So now that we have --quiet-build as default, can we talk about a forced LC_ALL=C again?

2011-12-04 Thread Michał Górny
On Sun, 4 Dec 2011 04:50:00 +0100 Jeroen Roovers wrote: > Subject says it all. More and more bug attachments appear that have > been generated with non-English locales, and it's a nuisance for both > bug reporters and bug wranglers to request/provide the sane > alternative that every developer sh

Re: [gentoo-dev] So now that we have --quiet-build as default, can we talk about a forced LC_ALL=C again?

2011-12-03 Thread Mike Frysinger
On Saturday 03 December 2011 22:50:00 Jeroen Roovers wrote: > Subject says it all. More and more bug attachments appear that have > been generated with non-English locales, and it's a nuisance for both > bug reporters and bug wranglers to request/provide the sane alternative > that every developer

Re: [gentoo-dev] So now that we have --quiet-build as default, can we talk about a forced LC_ALL=C again?

2011-12-03 Thread Alec Warner
On Sat, Dec 3, 2011 at 7:50 PM, Jeroen Roovers wrote: > Subject says it all. More and more bug attachments appear that have > been generated with non-English locales, and it's a nuisance for both > bug reporters and bug wranglers to request/provide the sane alternative > that every developer shoul

[gentoo-dev] So now that we have --quiet-build as default, can we talk about a forced LC_ALL=C again?

2011-12-03 Thread Jeroen Roovers
Subject says it all. More and more bug attachments appear that have been generated with non-English locales, and it's a nuisance for both bug reporters and bug wranglers to request/provide the sane alternative that every developer should be able to read. jer