2011/11/10 Tomáš Chvátal scarab...@gentoo.org:
Hi guys,
In last 3 days i recompiled chromium 3x
1x rebuild for cups useflag
1x update
1x rebuild for cups useflag
If you screw the ebuild up then always think if the change is worth
the stupid long recompile time.
I tentatively agree in
On Fri, 11 Nov 2011 00:22:34 -0800
Alec Warner anta...@gentoo.org wrote:
Like it is not enough there is version bump every few days...
Just alter only live ebuild and branch of it with each release and
do not alter the releases unless really critical bug is there.
People are patient and
2011/11/11 Alec Warner anta...@gentoo.org:
Like it is not enough there is version bump every few days...
Just alter only live ebuild and branch of it with each release and do
not alter the releases unless really critical bug is there. People are
patient and they can wait for bugfixes.
I
On Fri, Nov 11, 2011 at 08:58:14AM +0100, Tom Chv??tal wrote:
Hi guys,
In last 3 days i recompiled chromium 3x
1x rebuild for cups useflag
1x update
1x rebuild for cups useflag
snip
Chromium moves fast and you're obviously running unstable keywording.
Meaning you're
2011/11/11 Brian Harring ferri...@gmail.com:
On Fri, Nov 11, 2011 at 08:58:14AM +0100, Tom Chv??tal wrote:
Hi guys,
In last 3 days i recompiled chromium 3x
1x rebuild for cups useflag
1x update
1x rebuild for cups useflag
snip
Chromium moves fast and you're obviously running
On Fri, Nov 11, 2011 at 10:48:15AM +0100, Tom Chv??tal wrote:
2011/11/11 Brian Harring ferri...@gmail.com:
The build issue was with -cups so useflag was removed and hard
dependency enabled, fine with me.
But why the fuck the bump was issued next day still hard-depending on
it and in day
On Fri, 11 Nov 2011 09:45:29 +0100
Michał Górny mgo...@gentoo.org wrote:
Maybe you could consider some of the releases major and other minor,
and just keep a mask for those minor. Much like we did with Opera some
time ago.
I have no idea what you mean. It didn't look like that when I was
On Fri, 11 Nov 2011 15:44:07 +0100
Jeroen Roovers j...@gentoo.org wrote:
On Fri, 11 Nov 2011 09:45:29 +0100
Michał Górny mgo...@gentoo.org wrote:
Maybe you could consider some of the releases major and other minor,
and just keep a mask for those minor. Much like we did with Opera
some
On Fri, 11 Nov 2011 15:58:10 +0100
Michał Górny mgo...@gentoo.org wrote:
I simply mean that weekly builds were masked.
I still do it like that with snapshots and in fact with
the entire www-client/opera-next series.
jer
On Fri, Nov 11, 2011 at 3:02 PM, Brian Harring ferri...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Nov 11, 2011 at 08:58:14AM +0100, Tom Chv??tal wrote:
Hi guys,
In last 3 days i recompiled chromium 3x
1x rebuild for cups useflag
1x update
1x rebuild for cups useflag
snip
Chromium moves fast and
First thanks for the feedback about chromium, and sorry for the
annoyances. I'm not sure how we can fix that though.
I've batched my replies to several people in this e-mail.
On 11/11/11 8:58 AM, Tomáš Chvátal wrote:
In last 3 days i recompiled chromium 3x
So the timeline is:
26 Oct
Hi guys,
In last 3 days i recompiled chromium 3x
1x rebuild for cups useflag
1x update
1x rebuild for cups useflag
If you screw the ebuild up then always think if the change is worth
the stupid long recompile time.
Like it is not enough there is version bump every few days...
Just alter only
12 matches
Mail list logo
