On 01/23/2013 12:42 PM, Tomáš Chvátal wrote:
> It might be pretty usefull to actually see where the deps needed to be
> updated so we can take use of this feature where possible (also its a
> hint for lib maintainers to update their libs and see real impact).
Another useful hint, for those that ha
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On 24/01/13 11:39 AM, Zac Medico wrote:
> On 01/24/2013 07:15 AM, Ian Stakenvicius wrote:
>> In general, I would recommend for any library maintainers, to
>> either file bugs against the rdeps of a package or directly
>> update the rdeps (with permis
On 01/24/2013 07:15 AM, Ian Stakenvicius wrote:
> In general, I would recommend for any library maintainers, to either
> file bugs against the rdeps of a package or directly update the rdeps
> (with permission, of course) when implementing sub-slots. Of course,
> I believe the rdeps of a library c
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On 23/01/13 03:42 PM, Tomáš Chvátal wrote:
> Hi guys, do we have some scans that report libraries converted to
> subslots and lists their rdeps checked if they are updated
> accordingly?
>
> It might be pretty usefull to actually see where the deps
Hi guys,
do we have some scans that report libraries converted to subslots and
lists their rdeps checked if they are updated accordingly?
It might be pretty usefull to actually see where the deps needed to be
updated so we can take use of this feature where possible (also its a
hint for lib mainta