Re: [gentoo-dev] Suggested default LDFLAGS+="-Wl,-O1,--hash-style=gnu,--sort-common"

2008-07-12 Thread Javier Villavicencio
Arfrever Frehtes Taifersar Arahesis wrote: | 2008-07-09 15:45:15 Doug Goldstein napisał(a): |> Luca Barbato wrote: |>> Fabian Groffen wrote: |>>> On 30-06-2008 17:35:08 +0200, Arfrever Frehtes Taifersar Arahesis wrote: |> How can you easily revert it in a profile? | You can set LDFLAGS=""

Re: [gentoo-dev] Suggested default LDFLAGS+="-Wl,-O1,--hash-style=gnu,--sort-common"

2008-07-09 Thread Arfrever Frehtes Taifersar Arahesis
2008-07-09 15:45:15 Doug Goldstein napisał(a): > Luca Barbato wrote: > > Fabian Groffen wrote: > >> On 30-06-2008 17:35:08 +0200, Arfrever Frehtes Taifersar Arahesis wrote: > How can you easily revert it in a profile? > >>> You can set LDFLAGS="" in a subprofiles's make.defaults. > >> > >> How

Re: [gentoo-dev] Suggested default LDFLAGS+="-Wl,-O1,--hash-style=gnu,--sort-common"

2008-07-09 Thread Doug Goldstein
Luca Barbato wrote: Fabian Groffen wrote: On 30-06-2008 17:35:08 +0200, Arfrever Frehtes Taifersar Arahesis wrote: How can you easily revert it in a profile? You can set LDFLAGS="" in a subprofiles's make.defaults. How elegant... but I guess I'll have no choice. Shouldn't possible have a s

Re: [gentoo-dev] Suggested default LDFLAGS+="-Wl,-O1,--hash-style=gnu,--sort-common"

2008-07-03 Thread Luca Barbato
Fabian Groffen wrote: On 30-06-2008 17:35:08 +0200, Arfrever Frehtes Taifersar Arahesis wrote: How can you easily revert it in a profile? You can set LDFLAGS="" in a subprofiles's make.defaults. How elegant... but I guess I'll have no choice. Shouldn't possible have a subprofile with compil

Re: [gentoo-dev] Suggested default LDFLAGS+="-Wl,-O1,--hash-style=gnu,--sort-common"

2008-06-30 Thread Petteri Räty
Mike Frysinger kirjoitti: On Saturday 28 June 2008, Petteri Räty wrote: Arfrever Frehtes Taifersar Arahesis kirjoitti: I would like to suggest that default LDFLAGS in Gentoo contain the following flags: "-Wl,-O1,--hash-style=gnu,--sort-common". -O1 enables some basic optimizations. At least a

Re: [gentoo-dev] Suggested default LDFLAGS+="-Wl,-O1,--hash-style=gnu,--sort-common"

2008-06-30 Thread Fabian Groffen
On 30-06-2008 17:35:08 +0200, Arfrever Frehtes Taifersar Arahesis wrote: > > How can you easily revert it in a profile? > > You can set LDFLAGS="" in a subprofiles's make.defaults. How elegant... but I guess I'll have no choice. -- Fabian Groffen Gentoo on a different level -- gentoo-dev@list

Re: [gentoo-dev] Suggested default LDFLAGS+="-Wl,-O1,--hash-style=gnu,--sort-common"

2008-06-30 Thread Arfrever Frehtes Taifersar Arahesis
2008-06-30 10:57:21 Fabian Groffen napisał(a): > On 29-06-2008 20:28:39 -0700, Donnie Berkholz wrote: > > On 23:15 Sun 29 Jun , Fabian Groffen wrote: > > > On 29-06-2008 07:29:57 -0400, Mike Frysinger wrote: > > > > On Saturday 28 June 2008, Petteri Räty wrote: > > > > > Arfrever Frehtes Taifer

Re: [gentoo-dev] Suggested default LDFLAGS+="-Wl,-O1,--hash-style=gnu,--sort-common"

2008-06-30 Thread Fabian Groffen
On 29-06-2008 20:28:39 -0700, Donnie Berkholz wrote: > On 23:15 Sun 29 Jun , Fabian Groffen wrote: > > On 29-06-2008 07:29:57 -0400, Mike Frysinger wrote: > > > On Saturday 28 June 2008, Petteri Räty wrote: > > > > Arfrever Frehtes Taifersar Arahesis kirjoitti: > > > > > I would like to suggest

Re: [gentoo-dev] Suggested default LDFLAGS+="-Wl,-O1,--hash-style=gnu,--sort-common"

2008-06-29 Thread Donnie Berkholz
On 23:15 Sun 29 Jun , Fabian Groffen wrote: > On 29-06-2008 07:29:57 -0400, Mike Frysinger wrote: > > On Saturday 28 June 2008, Petteri Räty wrote: > > > Arfrever Frehtes Taifersar Arahesis kirjoitti: > > > > I would like to suggest that default LDFLAGS in Gentoo contain the > > > > following f

Re: [gentoo-dev] Suggested default LDFLAGS+="-Wl,-O1,--hash-style=gnu,--sort-common"

2008-06-29 Thread Fabian Groffen
On 29-06-2008 07:29:57 -0400, Mike Frysinger wrote: > On Saturday 28 June 2008, Petteri Räty wrote: > > Arfrever Frehtes Taifersar Arahesis kirjoitti: > > > I would like to suggest that default LDFLAGS in Gentoo contain the > > > following flags: "-Wl,-O1,--hash-style=gnu,--sort-common". > > > > >

Re: [gentoo-dev] Suggested default LDFLAGS+="-Wl,-O1,--hash-style=gnu,--sort-common"

2008-06-29 Thread Mike Frysinger
On Saturday 28 June 2008, Petteri Räty wrote: > Arfrever Frehtes Taifersar Arahesis kirjoitti: > > I would like to suggest that default LDFLAGS in Gentoo contain the > > following flags: "-Wl,-O1,--hash-style=gnu,--sort-common". > > > > -O1 enables some basic optimizations. > > At least adding -O1

Re: [gentoo-dev] Suggested default LDFLAGS+="-Wl,-O1,--hash-style=gnu,--sort-common"

2008-06-28 Thread Petteri Räty
Arfrever Frehtes Taifersar Arahesis kirjoitti: I would like to suggest that default LDFLAGS in Gentoo contain the following flags: "-Wl,-O1,--hash-style=gnu,--sort-common". -O1 enables some basic optimizations. > At least adding -O1 should not be problematic. I think vapier was already sugges

Re: [gentoo-dev] Suggested default LDFLAGS+="-Wl,-O1,--hash-style=gnu,--sort-common"

2008-06-24 Thread Fabian Groffen
On 24-06-2008 14:15:10 +0200, Arfrever Frehtes Taifersar Arahesis wrote: > I would like to suggest that default LDFLAGS in Gentoo contain the following > flags: "-Wl,-O1,--hash-style=gnu,--sort-common". > > -O1 enables some basic optimizations. > --hash-style=gnu causes that ld creates only new GN

[gentoo-dev] Suggested default LDFLAGS+="-Wl,-O1,--hash-style=gnu,--sort-common"

2008-06-24 Thread Arfrever Frehtes Taifersar Arahesis
I would like to suggest that default LDFLAGS in Gentoo contain the following flags: "-Wl,-O1,--hash-style=gnu,--sort-common". -O1 enables some basic optimizations. --hash-style=gnu causes that ld creates only new GNU-style hash tables. --sort-common causes that ld sorts the common symbols by size