Re: [gentoo-dev] Tinderboxing efforts in Gentoo

What a lazy guy that Alec is. Maybe the OSL will get a holiday gift ;) -A On Sun, Dec 4, 2016 at 2:56 PM, Robin H. Johnson wrote: > On Sun, Dec 04, 2016 at 10:26:11PM +, M. J. Everitt wrote: > > Is it worth the Foundation dropping a few $ for that hardware to *get* > > transported to its r

Re: [gentoo-dev] Tinderboxing efforts in Gentoo

On Sun, Dec 04, 2016 at 10:26:11PM +, M. J. Everitt wrote: > Is it worth the Foundation dropping a few $ for that hardware to *get* > transported to its rightful destination, or shall we wait a few more > years for something to happen!? :) The costs of shipping it was already approved, we're ju

Re: [gentoo-dev] Tinderboxing efforts in Gentoo

On Sunday, December 4, 2016 2:15:59 PM EST Alec Warner wrote: > On Fri, Dec 2, 2016 at 10:33 PM, Robin H. Johnson > > > > Flameeyes donated his tinderbox hardware, but it's still sitting at > > antarus's desk in Mountain View, waiting for him to ship it to OSUOSL > > (hopefully before it's even mo

Re: [gentoo-dev] Tinderboxing efforts in Gentoo

On 04/12/16 22:15, Alec Warner wrote: > > On Fri, Dec 2, 2016 at 10:33 PM, Robin H. Johnson > wrote: > > On Fri, Dec 02, 2016 at 02:10:27PM +0100, Michał Górny wrote: > > Hi, everyone. > > > > I've heard multiple times about various tinderbox projects bei

Re: [gentoo-dev] Tinderboxing efforts in Gentoo

On Fri, Dec 2, 2016 at 10:33 PM, Robin H. Johnson wrote: > On Fri, Dec 02, 2016 at 02:10:27PM +0100, Michał Górny wrote: > > Hi, everyone. > > > > I've heard multiple times about various tinderbox projects being > > started by individuals in Gentoo. In fact, so many different projects > > that I'

Re: [gentoo-dev] Tinderboxing efforts in Gentoo

On Sun, 4 Dec 2016 18:22:33 + Markos Chandras wrote: > On 12/04/2016 05:47 PM, Michał Górny wrote: > > On Sun, 4 Dec 2016 16:58:26 + > > Markos Chandras wrote: > > > >> On 12/03/2016 05:31 PM, Michał Górny wrote: > >>> On Sat, 3 Dec 2016 13:13:36 + > >>> Markos Chandras wrote:

Re: [gentoo-dev] Tinderboxing efforts in Gentoo

On 12/04/2016 05:47 PM, Michał Górny wrote: > On Sun, 4 Dec 2016 16:58:26 + > Markos Chandras wrote: > >> On 12/03/2016 05:31 PM, Michał Górny wrote: >>> On Sat, 3 Dec 2016 13:13:36 + >>> Markos Chandras wrote: >>> On 12/03/2016 10:41 AM, Michał Górny wrote: > On Sat, 3 Dec

Re: [gentoo-dev] Tinderboxing efforts in Gentoo

On 12/04/2016 12:47 PM, Michał Górny wrote: On Sun, 4 Dec 2016 16:58:26 + Markos Chandras wrote: On 12/03/2016 05:31 PM, Michał Górny wrote: On Sat, 3 Dec 2016 13:13:36 + Markos Chandras wrote: On 12/03/2016 10:41 AM, Michał Górny wrote: On Sat, 3 Dec 2016 10:35:32 +0100 Patrice C

Re: [gentoo-dev] Tinderboxing efforts in Gentoo

On Sun, 4 Dec 2016 16:58:26 + Markos Chandras wrote: > On 12/03/2016 05:31 PM, Michał Górny wrote: > > On Sat, 3 Dec 2016 13:13:36 + > > Markos Chandras wrote: > > > >> On 12/03/2016 10:41 AM, Michał Górny wrote: > >>> On Sat, 3 Dec 2016 10:35:32 +0100 > >>> Patrice Clement wrote:

Re: [gentoo-dev] Tinderboxing efforts in Gentoo

On 12/03/2016 05:31 PM, Michał Górny wrote: > On Sat, 3 Dec 2016 13:13:36 + > Markos Chandras wrote: > >> On 12/03/2016 10:41 AM, Michał Górny wrote: >>> On Sat, 3 Dec 2016 10:35:32 +0100 >>> Patrice Clement wrote: >>> Friday 02 Dec 2016 14:10:27, Michał Górny wrote : > Hi, eve

Re: [gentoo-dev] Tinderboxing efforts in Gentoo

On 04/12/16 14:03, Jorge Manuel B. S. Vicetto wrote: > > I recall some discussion about tinderboxing suggesting that more > important than testing all possible use flag combinations, would be to > test: > > * all use flags disabled (some packages fail miserabily if you don't > enable at least one

Re: [gentoo-dev] Tinderboxing efforts in Gentoo

On Sat, 3 Dec 2016, Michał Górny wrote: On Sat, 3 Dec 2016 13:13:36 + Markos Chandras wrote: On 12/03/2016 10:41 AM, Michał Górny wrote: On Sat, 3 Dec 2016 10:35:32 +0100 Patrice Clement wrote: Friday 02 Dec 2016 14:10:27, Michał Górny wrote : Hi, everyone. I've heard multiple times

Re: [gentoo-dev] Tinderboxing efforts in Gentoo

On Sat, 3 Dec 2016, Rich Freeman wrote: On Sat, Dec 3, 2016 at 9:47 AM, William L. Thomson Jr. wrote: On Saturday, December 3, 2016 9:33:00 AM EST Michael Orlitzky wrote: On 12/03/2016 09:25 AM, William L. Thomson Jr. wrote: This is generally considered infeasible: I would not think such, j

Re: [gentoo-dev] Tinderboxing efforts in Gentoo

On Fri, 2016-12-02 at 14:10 +0100, Michał Górny wrote: > Hi, everyone. > > I've heard multiple times about various tinderbox projects being > started by individuals in Gentoo. In fact, so many different projects > that I've forgotten who was working on most of them. > > I know that Toralf is doin

Re: [gentoo-dev] Tinderboxing efforts in Gentoo

On Saturday, December 3, 2016 6:30:08 PM EST Michał Górny wrote: > > "William L. Thomson Jr." wrote: > > > > Did any of the tinderboxes test all the various USE flag combinations or > > just the defaults? > > I'm sorry but you are going off-topic here. I'm trying to gather > information on any of

Re: [gentoo-dev] Tinderboxing efforts in Gentoo

On Sat, 3 Dec 2016 13:13:36 + Markos Chandras wrote: > On 12/03/2016 10:41 AM, Michał Górny wrote: > > On Sat, 3 Dec 2016 10:35:32 +0100 > > Patrice Clement wrote: > > > >> Friday 02 Dec 2016 14:10:27, Michał Górny wrote : > >>> Hi, everyone. > >>> > >>> I've heard multiple times about

Re: [gentoo-dev] Tinderboxing efforts in Gentoo

On Sat, 03 Dec 2016 09:08:42 -0500 "William L. Thomson Jr." wrote: > On Friday, December 2, 2016 2:10:27 PM EST Michał Górny wrote: > > Hi, everyone. > > > > I've heard multiple times about various tinderbox projects being > > started by individuals in Gentoo. In fact, so many different projects

Re: [gentoo-dev] Tinderboxing efforts in Gentoo

On 12/03/2016 10:39 AM, james wrote: On 12/03/2016 09:33 AM, Michael Orlitzky wrote: On 12/03/2016 09:25 AM, William L. Thomson Jr. wrote: Then a stage-4 image could be made available so anyone can install gentoo cluster nodes quickly and a bit of ansible code to load the framework onto a ope

Re: [gentoo-dev] Tinderboxing efforts in Gentoo

On Sat, Dec 3, 2016 at 9:47 AM, William L. Thomson Jr. wrote: > On Saturday, December 3, 2016 9:33:00 AM EST Michael Orlitzky wrote: >> On 12/03/2016 09:25 AM, William L. Thomson Jr. wrote: >> >> This is generally considered infeasible: >> > I would not think such, just need a wrapper to run aroun

Re: [gentoo-dev] Tinderboxing efforts in Gentoo

On 12/03/2016 09:33 AM, Michael Orlitzky wrote: On 12/03/2016 09:25 AM, William L. Thomson Jr. wrote: This is generally considered infeasible: I would not think such, just need a wrapper to run around each package that would get its USE flags and re-emerge it a few times. If a package has 1

Re: [gentoo-dev] Tinderboxing efforts in Gentoo

On 12/03/2016 08:13 AM, Markos Chandras wrote: On 12/03/2016 10:41 AM, Michał Górny wrote: On Sat, 3 Dec 2016 10:35:32 +0100 Patrice Clement wrote: Friday 02 Dec 2016 14:10:27, Michał Górny wrote : Hi, everyone. I've heard multiple times about various tinderbox projects being started by ind

Re: [gentoo-dev] Tinderboxing efforts in Gentoo

On Saturday, December 3, 2016 9:33:00 AM EST Michael Orlitzky wrote: > On 12/03/2016 09:25 AM, William L. Thomson Jr. wrote: > >> This is generally considered infeasible: > > I would not think such, just need a wrapper to run around each package > > that > > would get its USE flags and re-emerge it

Re: [gentoo-dev] Tinderboxing efforts in Gentoo

On 12/03/2016 09:25 AM, William L. Thomson Jr. wrote: >> >> This is generally considered infeasible: > > I would not think such, just need a wrapper to run around each package that > would get its USE flags and re-emerge it a few times. If a package has 10 USE flags, and if each can be set on/of

Re: [gentoo-dev] Tinderboxing efforts in Gentoo

On Saturday, December 3, 2016 9:14:32 AM EST Rich Freeman wrote: > On Sat, Dec 3, 2016 at 9:08 AM, William L. Thomson Jr. > > wrote: > > On Friday, December 2, 2016 2:10:27 PM EST Michał Górny wrote: > >> Hi, everyone. > >> > >> I've heard multiple times about various tinderbox projects being >

Re: [gentoo-dev] Tinderboxing efforts in Gentoo

On Sat, Dec 3, 2016 at 9:08 AM, William L. Thomson Jr. wrote: > On Friday, December 2, 2016 2:10:27 PM EST Michał Górny wrote: >> Hi, everyone. >> >> I've heard multiple times about various tinderbox projects being >> started by individuals in Gentoo. In fact, so many different projects >> that I'

Re: [gentoo-dev] Tinderboxing efforts in Gentoo

On Friday, December 2, 2016 2:10:27 PM EST Michał Górny wrote: > Hi, everyone. > > I've heard multiple times about various tinderbox projects being > started by individuals in Gentoo. In fact, so many different projects > that I've forgotten who was working on most of them. Did any of the tinderb

Re: [gentoo-dev] Tinderboxing efforts in Gentoo

On 12/03/2016 10:41 AM, Michał Górny wrote: > On Sat, 3 Dec 2016 10:35:32 +0100 > Patrice Clement wrote: > >> Friday 02 Dec 2016 14:10:27, Michał Górny wrote : >>> Hi, everyone. >>> >>> I've heard multiple times about various tinderbox projects being >>> started by individuals in Gentoo. In fact,

Re: [gentoo-dev] Tinderboxing efforts in Gentoo

On Sat, 3 Dec 2016 10:35:32 +0100 Patrice Clement wrote: > Friday 02 Dec 2016 14:10:27, Michał Górny wrote : > > Hi, everyone. > > > > I've heard multiple times about various tinderbox projects being > > started by individuals in Gentoo. In fact, so many different projects > > that I've forgotte

Re: [gentoo-dev] Tinderboxing efforts in Gentoo

Friday 02 Dec 2016 14:10:27, Michał Górny wrote : > Hi, everyone. > > I've heard multiple times about various tinderbox projects being > started by individuals in Gentoo. In fact, so many different projects > that I've forgotten who was working on most of them. > > I know that Toralf is doing tin

Re: [gentoo-dev] Tinderboxing efforts in Gentoo

On Sat, 03 Dec 2016 09:03:11 +0100 Magnus Granberg wrote: > fredag 2 december 2016 kl. 23:32:37 CET skrev Daniel Campbell: > > On 12/02/2016 06:09 AM, Michael Mol wrote: > > > On Friday, December 02, 2016 02:10:27 PM Michał Górny wrote: > > >> Hi, everyone. > > >> > > >> I've heard multiple

Re: [gentoo-dev] Tinderboxing efforts in Gentoo

fredag 2 december 2016 kl. 23:32:37 CET skrev Daniel Campbell: > On 12/02/2016 06:09 AM, Michael Mol wrote: > > On Friday, December 02, 2016 02:10:27 PM Michał Górny wrote: > >> Hi, everyone. > >> > >> I've heard multiple times about various tinderbox projects being > >> started by individuals in

Re: [gentoo-dev] Tinderboxing efforts in Gentoo

On 12/02/2016 06:09 AM, Michael Mol wrote: > On Friday, December 02, 2016 02:10:27 PM Michał Górny wrote: >> Hi, everyone. >> >> I've heard multiple times about various tinderbox projects being >> started by individuals in Gentoo. In fact, so many different projects >> that I've forgotten who was w

Re: [gentoo-dev] Tinderboxing efforts in Gentoo

On Fri, Dec 02, 2016 at 02:10:27PM +0100, Michał Górny wrote: > Hi, everyone. > > I've heard multiple times about various tinderbox projects being > started by individuals in Gentoo. In fact, so many different projects > that I've forgotten who was working on most of them. Flameeyes donated his ti

Re: [gentoo-dev] Tinderboxing efforts in Gentoo

On Friday, December 02, 2016 02:10:27 PM Michał Górny wrote: > Hi, everyone. > > I've heard multiple times about various tinderbox projects being > started by individuals in Gentoo. In fact, so many different projects > that I've forgotten who was working on most of them. > > I know that Toralf i

[gentoo-dev] Tinderboxing efforts in Gentoo

Hi, everyone. I've heard multiple times about various tinderbox projects being started by individuals in Gentoo. In fact, so many different projects that I've forgotten who was working on most of them. I know that Toralf is doing tinderboxing for most of the stuff. What other projects do we have