On Thu, Feb 23, 2012 at 4:24 AM, Jeff Horelick wrote:
> While i'm not willing to maintain mythtv myself (as I don't use it
> (anymore)) or join the herd, what about contacting upstream as they
> already have their own overlay [1] and see if they'd like to "proxy
> maintain" the official Gentoo pac
On 19 February 2012 21:46, Doug Goldstein wrote:
> Any specific procedure to unstable a package? Specifically MythTV.
> While there's a lot of user interest in the package, there's just not
> enough dev help with the package to really keep it up to snuff to what
> could be considered stable. Its w
On Sun, Feb 19, 2012 at 9:46 PM, Doug Goldstein wrote:
> Any specific procedure to unstable a package? Specifically MythTV.
> While there's a lot of user interest in the package, there's just not
> enough dev help with the package to really keep it up to snuff to what
> could be considered stable.
Any specific procedure to unstable a package? Specifically MythTV.
While there's a lot of user interest in the package, there's just not
enough dev help with the package to really keep it up to snuff to what
could be considered stable. Its woefully behind and I'd just be
happier to drop the current
