On Wed, Oct 28, 2009 at 4:51 AM, Petteri Räty betelge...@gentoo.org wrote:
Mike Frysinger wrote:
On Tuesday 27 October 2009 14:46:31 Petteri Räty wrote:
Normally old versions are not kept around as already said if you read
the thread.
normal is not the same thing as always. unless you're
Mike Frysinger wrote:
On Tuesday 27 October 2009 14:46:31 Petteri Räty wrote:
Normally old versions are not kept around as already said if you read
the thread.
normal is not the same thing as always. unless you're the maintainer,
you
have no idea whether old versions are kept there on
On Wed, 28 Oct 2009 11:51:34 +0200
Petteri Räty betelge...@gentoo.org wrote:
Mike Frysinger wrote:
On Tuesday 27 October 2009 14:46:31 Petteri Räty wrote:
Normally old versions are not kept around as already said if you
read the thread.
normal is not the same thing as always. unless
On Tuesday 27 October 2009 14:46:31 Petteri Räty wrote:
Normally old versions are not kept around as already said if you read
the thread.
normal is not the same thing as always. unless you're the maintainer, you
have no idea whether old versions are kept there on purpose. ive had people
Patrick Lauer wrote:
And that's with all the forced migrations for features like use-deps or the
removal of built_with_use. So unless there's some strongly needed features
there's no need for it. I can't remember any feature in the EAPI 3 list that
really looked useful to me, so not
Tomáš Chvátal wrote:
On čtvrtek 08 Říjen 2009, 23:34:10 Petteri Räty wrote:
Even this is wrong because:
Hi
...
betelge...@pena ~ $ portageq metadata / ebuild sys-libs/glibc-2.2.5-r10
IUSE nls
For most packages old versions are not kept around so just doing
=cat/foo-X.Y[use] is fine and
Marijn Schouten (hkBst) wrote:
Petteri Räty wrote:
I wrote a script to check which ebuilds use built_with_use and have
keywords in never versions making the ebuild unused. This means that
neither arch or ~arch users are likely to install the ebuild. The script
and the list of ebuilds is
Stelian Ionescu wrote:
On Tue, 2009-09-29 at 16:32 +0300, Petteri Räty wrote:
I wrote a script to check which ebuilds use built_with_use and have
keywords in never versions making the ebuild unused. This means that
neither arch or ~arch users are likely to install the ebuild. The script
and
On Thu, Oct 8, 2009 at 4:34 PM, Petteri Räty betelge...@gentoo.org wrote:
Stelian Ionescu wrote:
On Tue, 2009-09-29 at 16:32 +0300, Petteri Räty wrote:
I wrote a script to check which ebuilds use built_with_use and have
keywords in never versions making the ebuild unused. This means that
Jeremy Olexa wrote:
On Thu, Oct 8, 2009 at 4:34 PM, Petteri Räty betelge...@gentoo.org wrote:
Stelian Ionescu wrote:
On Tue, 2009-09-29 at 16:32 +0300, Petteri Räty wrote:
I wrote a script to check which ebuilds use built_with_use and have
keywords in never versions making the ebuild unused.
On čtvrtek 08 Říjen 2009, 23:34:10 Petteri Räty wrote:
Even this is wrong because:
Hi
...
betelge...@pena ~ $ portageq metadata / ebuild sys-libs/glibc-2.2.5-r10
IUSE nls
For most packages old versions are not kept around so just doing
=cat/foo-X.Y[use] is fine and EAPI 3 is not needed. I
On Friday 09 October 2009 00:22:26 Petteri Räty wrote:
across a case that couldn't be done with EAPI 2 yet. Granted the atoms
can be a bit cleaner with EAPI 3 but considering how much zmedico slacks
in implementing it, it's best to do migrating now with EAPI 2 than EAPI
Comments like
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Petteri Räty wrote:
I wrote a script to check which ebuilds use built_with_use and have
keywords in never versions making the ebuild unused. This means that
neither arch or ~arch users are likely to install the ebuild. The script
and the list of
I wrote a script to check which ebuilds use built_with_use and have
keywords in never versions making the ebuild unused. This means that
neither arch or ~arch users are likely to install the ebuild. The script
and the list of ebuilds is attached. I plan on removing all these
ebuilds two weeks from
14 matches
Mail list logo
