Santiago M. Mola wrote:
e) use a hook around unpack on your local system to detect new build.xml
for a list of packages.
AFAIK, checking changes is part of the bump process, so I think that's a
check you can do either at hand, with a script (it's always a good thing
to look for new files in
В Втр, 20/01/2009 в 21:04 +0200, Petteri Räty пишет:
So do you think:
a) cp -i is fine
No, interactivity is bad.
b) this function should be added to eutils
c) keep it restricted to java eclasses
I don't remember/know any other cases where this function can be useful.
So I think it's better
El mar, 20-01-2009 a las 21:04 +0200, Petteri Räty escribió:
d) something else
e) use a hook around unpack on your local system to detect new build.xml
for a list of packages.
AFAIK, checking changes is part of the bump process, so I think that's a
check you can do either at hand, with a
Many times upstream Java projects don't include build.xml files or
proper build systems so we include build.xml files in $FILESDIR. In case
upstream some day adds one we usually use cp -i to detect if upstream
adds this file in new versions. If devs do their job properly, this will
never show to
On Tue, 2009-01-20 at 21:04 +0200, Petteri Räty wrote:
Many times upstream Java projects don't include build.xml files or
proper build systems so we include build.xml files in $FILESDIR. In case
upstream some day adds one we usually use cp -i to detect if upstream
adds this file in new
Ferris McCormick wrote:
On Tue, 2009-01-20 at 21:04 +0200, Petteri Räty wrote:
Many times upstream Java projects don't include build.xml files or
proper build systems so we include build.xml files in $FILESDIR. In case
upstream some day adds one we usually use cp -i to detect if upstream
adds
On Tue, 2009-01-20 at 21:37 +0200, Petteri Räty wrote:
Ferris McCormick wrote:
On Tue, 2009-01-20 at 21:04 +0200, Petteri Räty wrote:
Many times upstream Java projects don't include build.xml files or
proper build systems so we include build.xml files in $FILESDIR. In case
upstream some
Ferris McCormick wrote:
'cp -i' will at least ask a question, and I find that marginally better
--- it's confusing, but at least it says something. But it seems to me
that if we hit this case, no one (including the package owner) knows
which .xml file to use, so stopping the build makes sense,
On Tue, 20 Jan 2009 23:50:47 +0100
Jan Kundrát j...@gentoo.org wrote:
Ferris McCormick wrote:
'cp -i' will at least ask a question, and I find that marginally better
--- it's confusing, but at least it says something. But it seems to me
that if we hit this case, no one (including the
On Tue, Jan 20, 2009 at 5:40 PM, Ferris McCormick fmc...@gentoo.org wrote:
On Tue, 20 Jan 2009 23:50:47 +0100
Jan Kundrát j...@gentoo.org wrote:
Ferris McCormick wrote:
'cp -i' will at least ask a question, and I find that marginally better
--- it's confusing, but at least it says
10 matches
Mail list logo
