Re: [gentoo-dev] What's on with ejabberd and relatives?

2006-03-02 Thread Lars Strojny
Am Sonntag, den 26.02.2006, 21:25 -0800 schrieb Donnie Berkholz: [...] You might want to talk to the maintainer and herd, not all of us. Or even file a bug for updates -- some people are very busy and just don't notice there's a new version. Tried to talk to the maintainer, no answer for days.

Re: [gentoo-dev] What's on with ejabberd and relatives?

2006-03-02 Thread Olivier Crete
On Thu, 2006-02-03 at 21:14 +0100, Lars Strojny wrote: Am Sonntag, den 26.02.2006, 21:25 -0800 schrieb Donnie Berkholz: [...] You might want to talk to the maintainer and herd, not all of us. Or even file a bug for updates -- some people are very busy and just don't notice there's a new

Re: [gentoo-dev] What's on with ejabberd and relatives?

2006-03-02 Thread Gustavo Felisberto
Lars Strojny wrote: Am Sonntag, den 26.02.2006, 21:25 -0800 schrieb Donnie Berkholz: [...] You might want to talk to the maintainer and herd, not all of us. Or even file a bug for updates -- some people are very busy and just don't notice there's a new version. Tried to talk to the

[gentoo-dev] What's on with ejabberd and relatives?

2006-02-26 Thread Lars Strojny
Hi all, I'm currently heavily involved with jabber-related packages. As a result I have to struggle with the really seldomn maintained packages in Gentoo. As an example: ejabberd 1.0 is not in portage until now, it was released in early december last year. There is not really a reason for this,

Re: [gentoo-dev] What's on with ejabberd and relatives?

2006-02-26 Thread Donnie Berkholz
Lars Strojny wrote: I'm currently heavily involved with jabber-related packages. As a result I have to struggle with the really seldomn maintained packages in Gentoo. ... To come to an end: jabber is not really the most unimportant thing, so things should go better. I want to provide my