[gentoo-dev] bugzilla 2.22 masked ~x86
Hi folks, I've just seen, current bugzilla is masked, and DBD::Pg too. As the documentation states ~x86 means, it's working, but not properly tested on this platform (ie. x86). How does the process of proving packages work ? I've made good experiences with bugzilla-2.22 - the whole installation (including the webapp installer) worked good. The only things I had to do by hand were adding the vhost to apache and creating the user and database in postgres, but mayb that's meant to be this way. cu -- - Enrico Weigelt== metux IT service phone: +49 36207 519931 www: http://www.metux.de/ fax: +49 36207 519932 email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] cellphone: +49 174 7066481 - -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list
Re: [gentoo-dev] bugzilla 2.22 masked ~x86
Enrico Weigelt wrote: How does the process of proving packages work ? Please file a stabilization bug on b.g.o with ebuild version and `emerge --info`. -- Krzysiek Pawlik nelchael at gentoo.org key id: 0xBC51 desktop-misc, desktop-dock, desktop-wm, x86, java, apache... signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Re: [gentoo-dev] bugzilla 2.22 masked ~x86
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Enrico Weigelt wrote: Hi folks, I've just seen, current bugzilla is masked, and DBD::Pg too. As the documentation states ~x86 means, it's working, but not properly tested on this platform (ie. x86). How does the process of proving packages work ? I've made good experiences with bugzilla-2.22 - the whole installation (including the webapp installer) worked good. The only things I had to do by hand were adding the vhost to apache and creating the user and database in postgres, but mayb that's meant to be this way. cu Please file it with the maintainer/herd of the package, instead of directly to the arch team you want it stable. In this case x86. It makes it easier for the arch team to not have to filter through bugs and track down maintainers ourselves. -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.3 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFEq98QSENan+PfizARAuOmAJsGHDubaNIN3gQmIMJ8wz2/Dny3CACfcgv1 gsWKO8FNr0r2Z5ZFYW5/n3w= =96km -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list
Re: [gentoo-dev] bugzilla 2.22 masked ~x86
* Joshua Jackson [EMAIL PROTECTED] schrieb: snip Please file it with the maintainer/herd of the package, instead of directly to the arch team you want it stable. In this case x86. It makes it easier for the arch team to not have to filter through bugs and track down maintainers ourselves. How should I exactly file it ? What should I select / put in the fields like component, platform, ... ? cu -- - Enrico Weigelt== metux IT service phone: +49 36207 519931 www: http://www.metux.de/ fax: +49 36207 519932 email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] cellphone: +49 174 7066481 - -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list
Re: [gentoo-dev] bugzilla 2.22 masked ~x86
On Wed, Jul 5, 2006 at 19:15:50 +0200, Enrico Weigelt wrote: * Joshua Jackson [EMAIL PROTECTED] schrieb: snip Please file it with the maintainer/herd of the package, instead of directly to the arch team you want it stable. In this case x86. It makes it easier for the arch team to not have to filter through bugs and track down maintainers ourselves. How should I exactly file it ? What should I select / put in the fields like component, platform, ... ? Sorry if that doesn't sound very nice, but could you please stop posting to this list every time you have an issue, especially if the information you are looking for is easily available (here for instance, just click on the hyperlinks to see a description). There are also other media, like IRC, forums, bugzilla or docs that can answer to your questions. gentoo-dev is a (quite) high traffic list and if everyone posts here anytime they have an issue or a question, it will become unbearable. Thanks in advance /Alexandre -- Hi, I'm a .signature virus! Please copy me in your ~/.signature. pgpH5kiSXVZgJ.pgp Description: PGP signature
Re: [gentoo-dev] bugzilla 2.22 masked ~x86
* Alexandre Buisse [EMAIL PROTECTED] schrieb: snip Sorry if that doesn't sound very nice, but could you please stop posting to this list every time you have an issue, especially if the information you are looking for is easily available (here for instance, just click on the hyperlinks to see a description). There are also other media, like IRC, forums, bugzilla or docs that can answer to your questions. Okay, if this short question cannot be anwered with an short help or an direct pointer to some help, it seems my contribution obviously isn't wanted. So I won't waste anymore of your and my time on this topic and don't file a bug. Just forget about it. cu -- - Enrico Weigelt== metux IT service - http://www.metux.de/ - Please visit the OpenSource QM Taskforce: http://wiki.metux.de/public/OpenSource_QM_Taskforce Patches / Fixes for a lot dozens of packages in dozens of versions: http://patches.metux.de/ - -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list
Re: [gentoo-dev] bugzilla 2.22 masked ~x86
On 7/5/06, Enrico Weigelt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Okay, if this short question cannot be anwered with an short help or an direct pointer to some help, it seems my contribution obviously isn't wanted. So I won't waste anymore of your and my time on this topic and don't file a bug. Just forget about it. He did give you a pointer to some help: just click on the hyperlinks to see a description. All the help/documentation you need should be on the bug entry form. Click on Component (the link, not the list), and the help indicates it should be set to Applications. Platform is x86 (duh!).Priority, Severity, OS, etc are all explained right there. Assign to will be [EMAIL PROTECTED] (based on metadata.xml and Joshua's mail). If you still aren't sure what a stabilization bug looks like, you could search bugzilla for stabilize and get lots of examples. Or ask on -user. -Richard -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list
