[gentoo-dev] changing EAPI on existing ebuilds. To bump or not?

2008-09-29 Thread Alistair Bush
I was thinking about this a day or 2 ago and just noticed that a similar situation has come up. Please refer to https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=239006 but basically. =dev-java/ant-antlr-1.7.1 was changed from EAPI=1 to EAPI=2 to take advantage of the use flag dep functionality. now, I

Re: [gentoo-dev] changing EAPI on existing ebuilds. To bump or not?

2008-09-29 Thread Ciaran McCreesh
On Mon, 29 Sep 2008 21:39:41 +1300 Alistair Bush [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Anyway, would be nice to get some feedback, idea's on this and hopefully also a more detailed explaination from a pm's perspective (if there is one). For current EAPIs, there's nothing specifically wrong about changing

Re: [gentoo-dev] changing EAPI on existing ebuilds. To bump or not?

2008-09-29 Thread Petteri Räty
Ciaran McCreesh kirjoitti: On Mon, 29 Sep 2008 21:39:41 +1300 Alistair Bush [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Anyway, would be nice to get some feedback, idea's on this and hopefully also a more detailed explaination from a pm's perspective (if there is one). For current EAPIs, there's nothing