On Wed, 2005-12-28 at 21:52 +0200, Petteri Räty wrote:
Paul de Vrieze wrote:
On Wednesday 28 December 2005 17:26, Petteri Räty wrote:
I just picked some package as an example of the output with
openoffice-bin. My understanding here is that if you link against those
libraries, it will
On Tuesday 27 December 2005 23:12, Petteri Räty wrote:
This has the side affect that the library location code is not used
until I code or take the logic from glibc from example.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] ~/bin $ checkdeps.rb subversion
dev-libs/apr
dev-libs/apr-util
dev-libs/expat
Paul de Vrieze wrote:
On Tuesday 27 December 2005 23:12, Petteri Räty wrote:
This has the side affect that the library location code is not used
until I code or take the logic from glibc from example.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] ~/bin $ checkdeps.rb subversion
dev-libs/apr
dev-libs/apr-util
On Wednesday 28 December 2005 17:26, Petteri Räty wrote:
I just picked some package as an example of the output with
openoffice-bin. My understanding here is that if you link against those
libraries, it will break break binary packages because dependencies
don't say to pull in required
Paul de Vrieze wrote:
On Wednesday 28 December 2005 17:26, Petteri Räty wrote:
I just picked some package as an example of the output with
openoffice-bin. My understanding here is that if you link against those
libraries, it will break break binary packages because dependencies
don't say to
On Wednesday 28 December 2005 11:11, Paul de Vrieze wrote:
Unfortunately scanelf also doesn't know (nor can it know)
no utility will be able to passively calculate dependencies that happen via
dlopen() or any similar dynamic library loading interface
-mike
--
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list
On Wednesday 28 December 2005 21:13, Mike Frysinger wrote:
On Wednesday 28 December 2005 11:11, Paul de Vrieze wrote:
Unfortunately scanelf also doesn't know (nor can it know)
no utility will be able to passively calculate dependencies that happen via
dlopen() or any similar dynamic library
Mike Frysinger wrote:
On Fri, Dec 23, 2005 at 01:09:08PM +0200, Petteri R??ty wrote:
Basically it does ldd on all
the elf files in a package and then checks to which packages those
libraries belong.
ldd is garbage for this purpose
use `readelf -d ELF | grep NEEDED` or just `scanelf -n
http://dev.gentoo.org/~betelgeuse/scripts/checkdeps.rb
Some people will probably find this useful. Basically it does ldd on all
the elf files in a package and then checks to which packages those
libraries belong. I think portage people are working on integrating
something like this to portage in
On Fri, 23 Dec 2005 13:09:08 +0200
Petteri Räty [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Basically it does ldd on all the elf files in a package and then
checks to which packages those libraries belong.
I don't think ldd alone is the way to go, because it doesn't make
distinction beetween direct and indirect
On Fri, Dec 23, 2005 at 01:09:08PM +0200, Petteri R??ty wrote:
Basically it does ldd on all
the elf files in a package and then checks to which packages those
libraries belong.
ldd is garbage for this purpose
use `readelf -d ELF | grep NEEDED` or just `scanelf -n ELF`
-mike
--
11 matches
Mail list logo
