On 27-01-2006 08:44:14 -0500, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> On Monday 23 January 2006 23:04, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> > for those who dont know what i'm talking about, consider:
> > tail -1
> > head -1
> >
>
> it would seem i lied about this (at least the first two still work)
FYI:
sort +0 doesn't work
On Friday 27 January 2006 08:44, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> On Monday 23 January 2006 23:04, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> > for those who dont know what i'm talking about, consider:
> > tail -1
> > head -1
> >
>
> it would seem i lied about this (at least the first two still work)
Still, the behavior of
On Monday 23 January 2006 23:04, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> for those who dont know what i'm talking about, consider:
> tail -1
> head -1
>
it would seem i lied about this (at least the first two still work)
the source code was refactored and i assumed this to mean they cut out the
backwards compa
On Tuesday 24 January 2006 05:19, Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
> Pretty much the same issue for findutils-4.3. You'll have to get the
> argument order correct and remember to include the path.
I'm very glad of this :P
--
Diego "Flameeyes" Pettenò - http://dev.gentoo.org/~flameeyes/
Gentoo/ALT lead, Gen
On Mon, 23 Jan 2006 23:04:48 -0500 Mike Frysinger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
| as a heads up, the next version of coreutils i add to portage (5.93)
| drops support for all those options upstream had labeled before as
| simply "deprecated" ... this isnt a patch i'm adding or not adding,
| upstream f
as a heads up, the next version of coreutils i add to portage (5.93) drops
support for all those options upstream had labeled before as simply
"deprecated" ... this isnt a patch i'm adding or not adding, upstream finally
cut out all the code with these latest releases
for those who dont know wh
