On Fri, 2008-02-01 at 08:54 -0500, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> On Friday 01 February 2008, Natanael Copa wrote:
> > On Thu, 2008-01-31 at 18:46 -0500, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> > > On Thursday 31 January 2008, Natanael Copa wrote:
...
> > > > I can create a bug on this so we get rid of both perl and deb
On Friday 01 February 2008, Natanael Copa wrote:
> On Thu, 2008-01-31 at 18:46 -0500, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> > On Thursday 31 January 2008, Natanael Copa wrote:
> > > On Wed, 2008-01-30 at 12:35 -0500, Philip Webb wrote:
> > > > 080128 Mike Frysinger wrote:
> > > > > now that the mktemp binary has
On Thu, 2008-01-31 at 18:46 -0500, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> On Thursday 31 January 2008, Natanael Copa wrote:
> > On Wed, 2008-01-30 at 12:35 -0500, Philip Webb wrote:
> > > 080128 Mike Frysinger wrote:
> > > > now that the mktemp binary has been moved out of debianutils
> > > > and integrated stra
On Thursday 31 January 2008, Natanael Copa wrote:
> On Wed, 2008-01-30 at 12:35 -0500, Philip Webb wrote:
> > 080128 Mike Frysinger wrote:
> > > now that the mktemp binary has been moved out of debianutils
> > > and integrated straight into coreutils,
> > > perhaps it's time to ask how important th
On Wed, 2008-01-30 at 12:35 -0500, Philip Webb wrote:
> 080128 Mike Frysinger wrote:
> > now that the mktemp binary has been moved out of debianutils
> > and integrated straight into coreutils,
> > perhaps it's time to ask how important this package is to everyone.
> > current debianutils is part
On Wed, 2008-01-30 at 10:32 -0800, Chris Gianelloni wrote:
> That nothing that you've said counters the package not being needed in
> the system target. In fact, the packages that you list all explicitly
> depend on debianutils, so they wouldn't break if we removed it from
> system. The problem i
On Wed, 2008-01-30 at 12:35 -0500, Philip Webb wrote:
> 'equery d debianutils' gives me
>
> app-admin/sysklogd-1.4.2_pre20061230 (sys-apps/debianutils)
> app-portage/gentoolkit-0.2.3-r1 (userland_GNU? sys-apps/debianutils)
> sys-apps/mktemp-1.5 (>=sys-apps/debianutils-2.16.2)
>
> The 2nd c
On Jan 30, 2008 6:35 PM, Philip Webb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> 'equery d debianutils' gives me
>
> app-admin/sysklogd-1.4.2_pre20061230 (sys-apps/debianutils)
> app-portage/gentoolkit-0.2.3-r1 (userland_GNU? sys-apps/debianutils)
> sys-apps/mktemp-1.5 (>=sys-apps/debianutils-2.16.2)
>
>
080128 Mike Frysinger wrote:
> now that the mktemp binary has been moved out of debianutils
> and integrated straight into coreutils,
> perhaps it's time to ask how important this package is to everyone.
> current debianutils is part of "system" and provides:
> - installkernel
> - run-parts
> -
On Mon, 28 Jan 2008 21:43:38 +0100
"Matthias B." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> What's wrong with making it an optional dependency? Something like a
> useflag
Because if this would be done consistently we'd end up with several
thousand use flags long term, not really what I'd call managable.
Unfor
On Mon, 28 Jan 2008 19:59:39 +0200 Petteri Räty <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> Krzysiek Pawlik kirjoitti:
> > Yuri Vasilevski wrote:
> >> I would say drop it from system and add to RDEPEND in kernel-2.eclass
> >> for ${ETYPE} == sources.
> >
> > IMHO that's a bad idea - everybody use some kernel so
Ciaran McCreesh kirjoitti:
On Mon, 28 Jan 2008 19:59:39 +0200
Petteri Räty <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
BSD, prefix etc. I would say breaking make install is worse than
requiring people to keep debianutils installed. They can just use
package.provided if they want to get rid of it.
...which the
On Mon, 28 Jan 2008 19:59:39 +0200
Petteri Räty <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> BSD, prefix etc. I would say breaking make install is worse than
> requiring people to keep debianutils installed. They can just use
> package.provided if they want to get rid of it.
...which then breaks things that hav
On Mon, Jan 28, 2008 at 07:23:18AM -0500, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> now that the mktemp binary has been moved out of debianutils and integrated
> straight into coreutils, perhaps it's time to ask how important this package
> is to everyone. current debianutils is part of "system" and provides:
>
Krzysiek Pawlik kirjoitti:
Yuri Vasilevski wrote:
I would say drop it from system and add to RDEPEND in kernel-2.eclass
for ${ETYPE} == sources.
IMHO that's a bad idea - everybody use some kernel sources, but not
everybody runs `make install'. I'm for dropping debianutils from system.
BSD
Yuri Vasilevski wrote:
I would say drop it from system and add to RDEPEND in kernel-2.eclass
for ${ETYPE} == sources.
IMHO that's a bad idea - everybody use some kernel sources, but not everybody
runs `make install'. I'm for dropping debianutils from system.
--
Krzysiek Pawlik key id: 0
Yuri Vasilevski kirjoitti:
On Mon, 28 Jan 2008 07:23:18 -0500
Mike Frysinger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
now that the mktemp binary has been moved out of debianutils and
integrated straight into coreutils, perhaps it's time to ask how
important this package is to everyone. current debianutils i
On Mon, 28 Jan 2008 07:23:18 -0500
Mike Frysinger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> now that the mktemp binary has been moved out of debianutils and
> integrated straight into coreutils, perhaps it's time to ask how
> important this package is to everyone. current debianutils is part
> of "system" and
Mike Frysinger wrote:
now that the mktemp binary has been moved out of debianutils and integrated
straight into coreutils, perhaps it's time to ask how important this package
is to everyone. current debianutils is part of "system" and provides:
- installkernel
- run-parts
- tempfile
- save
On 28-01-2008 07:23:18 -0500, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> do people consider these things critical ? i dont know the last time i
> personally needed/wanted any of these ...
Given that it needs a jumbo patch to compile on non-GNU/Linux systems
lacking GNU getopt, I wouldn't mind if it would get dropp
Mike Frysinger a écrit :
do people consider these things critical ? i dont know the last time i
personally needed/wanted any of these ...
I for one didn't even know what tools it provided ... let alone what I
might use them for.
Rémi
--
gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org mailing list
now that the mktemp binary has been moved out of debianutils and integrated
straight into coreutils, perhaps it's time to ask how important this package
is to everyone. current debianutils is part of "system" and provides:
- installkernel
- run-parts
- tempfile
- savelog
- mkboot
do people
22 matches
Mail list logo
