On 11/05/2019 18.00, Virgil Dupras wrote: > Although I don't use it anymore because I find it too heavy for my > needs, Ansible is generally seen as a good replacement. FWIW Ansible does not seems that heavy when you realize that you can put a exec bit on a playbook, set shebang to ansible-playbook, set it to being a locally executed and define tasks within playbook itself, like: #!/usr/bin/env -S ansible-playbook -i localhost, - name: playbook gather_facts: false connection: local hosts: localhost tasks: - name: foo debug: msg: 'blah' Gets the job done really well. -- Piotr.
On Sat, 11 May 2019 09:52:11 +0200 Dennis Schridde wrote: > Hi Virgil! > > On Freitag, 10. Mai 2019 20:21:49 CEST Virgil Dupras wrote: > > As soon as the needs go over a bash script, there are much better tools out > > there for the job. > > Which tools do you recommend? > > --Dennis Although I don't use it anymore because I find it too heavy for my needs, Ansible is generally seen as a good replacement. Virgil pgpcUWdSIjhCc.pgp Description: PGP signature
I'd like to last rite it but I thought I'd ask around and see if anyone use this. This package was popular in its first incarnation (py2 only) and I personally used it, but the v2 rewrite is really bad, doesn't have a good migration path for v1 scripts, and there's no point in using this over a simple bash script for new projects. As soon as the needs go over a bash script, there are much better tools out there for the job. With py2 going dark, if nobody uses its v2, there's no point in keeping it around. Unless someone is interested... pgp7_r_xn_tf9.pgp Description: PGP signature