Re: [gentoo-dev] do we need special elog messages for bindist?

2015-03-04 Thread Paweł Hajdan, Jr.
On 2/25/15 8:38 PM, Mike Gilbert wrote: > I would like to remove the elog for a couple of reasons: > > 1. The use flag description is there for whoever cares to read it. > There is no need to alert the user every time. > 2. We are not lawyers, and I have no business giving legal advice > about pat

Re: [gentoo-dev] do we need special elog messages for bindist?

2015-02-25 Thread Ben Kohler
On Wed, Feb 25, 2015 at 1:38 PM, Mike Gilbert wrote: > > > I would like to remove the elog for a couple of reasons: > > 1. The use flag description is there for whoever cares to read it. > There is no need to alert the user every time. > 2. We are not lawyers, and I have no business giving legal a

Re: [gentoo-dev] do we need special elog messages for bindist?

2015-02-25 Thread Mike Gilbert
On Wed, Feb 25, 2015 at 1:17 PM, "Paweł Hajdan, Jr." wrote: > I'm looking at which > suggests removing elog messages chromium has for bindist: > > This is the snippet we use in the ebuild: > > if use bindist; then > elog "bin

[gentoo-dev] do we need special elog messages for bindist?

2015-02-25 Thread Paweł Hajdan, Jr.
I'm looking at which suggests removing elog messages chromium has for bindist: This is the snippet we use in the ebuild: if use bindist; then elog "bindist enabled: H.264 video support will be disabled." else