Re: [gentoo-dev] doenvd vs. insinto /etc/env.d
Doug Goldstein wrote:
> Mike Frysinger wrote:
>> On Monday 09 April 2007, Petteri Räty wrote:
>>> Marcelo Góes kirjoitti:
I just did a quick grep of the tree and found 129 ebuilds that
use doenvd and 134 that use insinto /etc/env.d.
>>> There are probably also lot of things using insinto /etc/init.d and
>>> /etc/conf.d too that should be fixed.
>> yep ... reason the {do,new}{init,conf}d functions were implemented
>> -mike
>
> Stupid question... what's the diff between doconfd and newconfd?
>
Ha.. I remember now... Thanks robbat2 for kicking me in the head to jog
my memory...
--
Doug Goldstein <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
http://dev.gentoo.org/~cardoe/
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Re: [gentoo-dev] doenvd vs. insinto /etc/env.d
Mike Frysinger wrote:
> On Monday 09 April 2007, Petteri Räty wrote:
>> Marcelo Góes kirjoitti:
>>> I just did a quick grep of the tree and found 129 ebuilds that
>>> use doenvd and 134 that use insinto /etc/env.d.
>> There are probably also lot of things using insinto /etc/init.d and
>> /etc/conf.d too that should be fixed.
>
> yep ... reason the {do,new}{init,conf}d functions were implemented
> -mike
Stupid question... what's the diff between doconfd and newconfd?
--
Doug Goldstein <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
http://dev.gentoo.org/~cardoe/
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Re: [gentoo-dev] doenvd vs. insinto /etc/env.d
On Monday 09 April 2007, Petteri Räty wrote:
> Marcelo Góes kirjoitti:
> > I just did a quick grep of the tree and found 129 ebuilds that
> > use doenvd and 134 that use insinto /etc/env.d.
>
> There are probably also lot of things using insinto /etc/init.d and
> /etc/conf.d too that should be fixed.
yep ... reason the {do,new}{init,conf}d functions were implemented
-mike
pgpzn870B2ACD.pgp
Description: PGP signature
Re: [gentoo-dev] doenvd vs. insinto /etc/env.d
On Monday 09 April 2007 05:39:29 Mike Frysinger wrote: > On Sunday 08 April 2007, Marcelo Góes wrote: > > As far as I can see, doenvd is more correct because it is > > doenvd was written specifically to replace `insinto /etc/env.d` > > > Does it make sense to allow both styles? > > not really > > > Is it worth it to convert everything to doenvd? > > yes please > -mike See bug 173884 for further reference. -- Christian Heim GPG key ID: 9A9F68E6 Fingerprint: AEC4 87B8 32B8 4922 B3A9 DF79 CAE3 556F 9A9F 68E6 pgp6ORHt77vD2.pgp Description: PGP signature
Re: [gentoo-dev] doenvd vs. insinto /etc/env.d
Marcelo Góes kirjoitti: > Hello, > > I just did a quick grep of the tree and found 129 ebuilds that > use doenvd and 134 that use insinto /etc/env.d. > There are probably also lot of things using insinto /etc/init.d and /etc/conf.d too that should be fixed. Regards, Petter signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Re: [gentoo-dev] doenvd vs. insinto /etc/env.d
On Sunday 08 April 2007, Marcelo Góes wrote: > As far as I can see, doenvd is more correct because it is doenvd was written specifically to replace `insinto /etc/env.d` > Does it make sense to allow both styles? not really > Is it worth it to convert everything to doenvd? yes please -mike pgp0P1jQP6Vxu.pgp Description: PGP signature
[gentoo-dev] doenvd vs. insinto /etc/env.d
Hello, I just did a quick grep of the tree and found 129 ebuilds that use doenvd and 134 that use insinto /etc/env.d. As far as I can see, doenvd is more correct because it is 1) cleaner and easier to read 2) more portable (for systems that use something other than /etc/env.d, for example) Does it make sense to allow both styles? Is it worth it to convert everything to doenvd? Cheers, Marcelo -- Marcelo Góes -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list
