> On Mon, 28 Jun 2021, Michał Górny wrote:
> That said, it might be more consistent to change Portage behavior to use
> some visible distinction between output types (not just color), e.g.
> have it output:
> * [QA] ...
> * [WA] ...
> * [ER] ...
+1
Not sure if it's any standard that shou
On lunedì 28 giugno 2021 11:28:23 CEST Michał Górny wrote:
> That said, it might be more consistent to change Portage behavior to use
> some visible distinction between output types (not just color), e.g.
> have it output:
>
> * [QA] ...
> * [WA] ...
> * [ER] ...
+1
Agostino
On Mon, 2021-06-28 at 09:46 +0200, Agostino Sarubbo wrote:
> Hello,
>
> atm we have qa checks in:
> - ${PORTDIR}/metadata/install-qa-check.d
> - /usr/lib/portage/pythonX.Y/install-qa-check.d (installed via portage)
>
> Many of them do not begin as "Qa Notice" so it is very hard track them
> with
Hello,
atm we have qa checks in:
- ${PORTDIR}/metadata/install-qa-check.d
- /usr/lib/portage/pythonX.Y/install-qa-check.d (installed via portage)
Many of them do not begin as "Qa Notice" so it is very hard track them without
naked eye especially via tinderbox.
There is a bug where I reported pa
