Re: Getting gcc-6 keyworded (was: Re: [gentoo-dev] gcc-6.x status inquiry)

2017-05-04 Thread Andreas K. Huettel 
Am Donnerstag, 4. Mai 2017, 23:32:19 CEST schrieb Andreas K. Huettel:
> OK since
> 
> a) nobody from toolchain responds here,
> b) a lot of people are in favour of doing this, but
> c) noone wants to do it himself, and

Forget this. William already did it. YAY!!!

-- 
Andreas K. Hüttel
dilfri...@gentoo.org
Gentoo Linux developer (council, perl, libreoffice)

signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.

Getting gcc-6 keyworded (was: Re: [gentoo-dev] gcc-6.x status inquiry)

2017-05-04 Thread Andreas K. Huettel 
OK since 

a) nobody from toolchain responds here, 
b) a lot of people are in favour of doing this, but 
c) noone wants to do it himself, and 
d) I dont have the time to do all the research I deem necessary to do it 
myself, 

let's harness the power of the developer community. 

https://wiki.gentoo.org/wiki/Project:Toolchain/GCC-6_keywording

Go here^, look at one blocker bug, decide why it shouldn't block keywording 
gcc-6, and comment in the list, ending your comment with . In the end 
hopefully all the entries should look like

* bug 12345: Occurs only with -funroll-loops. User:Dilfridge

-- 
Andreas K. Hüttel
dilfri...@gentoo.org
Gentoo Linux developer (council, perl, libreoffice)

signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.

Re: [gentoo-dev] gcc-6.x status inquiry

2017-05-04 Thread Matthias Maier 
> After the discussion on this thread (no one seemed to object), I went
> ahead just now and added ~ keywords to sys-devel/gcc-6.3.0.

Thanks a lot!

Did you update any keywording bug (if one is open at all)?

Best,
Matthias


signature.asc
Description: PGP signature

Re: [gentoo-dev] gcc-6.x status inquiry

2017-05-04 Thread William Hubbs 
On Wed, May 03, 2017 at 11:43:11AM -0500, William Hubbs wrote:
> Hey all,
> 
> I am asking about this because I have been asked to look into
> packaging software that has a specific requirement for >=gcc-6 in order
> to build [1].
> 
> I see that gcc-6.3 doesn't have keywords, so I'm
> wondering when it will get them? Does anyone have any idea? I'm not
> talking about stable keywords, just ~. ;-)

After the discussion on this thread (no one seemed to object), I went
ahead just now and added ~ keywords to sys-devel/gcc-6.3.0.

Thanks,

William



signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

Re: [gentoo-dev] gcc-6.x status inquiry

2017-05-04 Thread Thomas Deutschmann 
On 2017-05-03 21:25, Matthias Maier wrote:
> Let's keyword gcc-6 and try to get gcc-7 into the tree on time.

+1


-- 
Regards,
Thomas




signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Re: [gentoo-dev] gcc-6.x status inquiry

2017-05-03 Thread Matthias Maier 

> Just as a datapoint, my main dev system is ~80% stable and has been updating 
> with gcc-6 since beginning of february; no problems. [*] [**]

Same here. The gcc-6 incompatibilities were resolved quite a while
ago. Let's keyword gcc-6 and try to get gcc-7 into the tree on time.

Best,
Matthias


signature.asc
Description: PGP signature

Re: [gentoo-dev] gcc-6.x status inquiry

2017-05-03 Thread Andreas K. Huettel 
> 
> I see that gcc-6.3 doesn't have keywords, so I'm
> wondering when it will get them? Does anyone have any idea? I'm not
> talking about stable keywords, just ~. ;-)
> 

Just as a datapoint, my main dev system is ~80% stable and has been updating 
with gcc-6 since beginning of february; no problems. [*] [**]

Without looking at the blockers I'd be fine with ~arch gcc-6.3 asap (so we can 
eventually get gcc-7 in masked).

[*] Well I had to fix a sci-* package I'm mantaining myself, but I'm likely the 
only user of it, so...

[**] That include "no problems when building firefox".

-- 
Andreas K. Hüttel
dilfri...@gentoo.org
Gentoo Linux developer (council, perl, libreoffice)

signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.

Re: [gentoo-dev] gcc-6.x status inquiry

2017-05-03 Thread Hanno Böck 
On Wed, 3 May 2017 11:43:11 -0500
William Hubbs  wrote:

> I see that gcc-6.3 doesn't have keywords, so I'm
> wondering when it will get them? Does anyone have any idea? I'm not
> talking about stable keywords, just ~. ;-)

Given that gcc 7.1 was just released and gcc 6 isn't even keyworded yet
I'm wondering if it'd be an idea to right away strive for gcc 7 and
skip keywording+stabilizing gcc 6.x in gentoo.

-- 
Hanno Böck
https://hboeck.de/

mail/jabber: ha...@hboeck.de
GPG: FE73757FA60E4E21B937579FA5880072BBB51E42


pgptZTut91Vj6.pgp
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

[gentoo-dev] gcc-6.x status inquiry

2017-05-03 Thread William Hubbs 
Hey all,

I am asking about this because I have been asked to look into
packaging software that has a specific requirement for >=gcc-6 in order
to build [1].

I see that gcc-6.3 doesn't have keywords, so I'm
wondering when it will get them? Does anyone have any idea? I'm not
talking about stable keywords, just ~. ;-)

Thanks much,

William

[1] https://www.cockroachlabs.com/docs/install-cockroachdb.html


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature