[gentoo-dev] genkernel 3.4.11.1 released

2011-01-20 Thread Sebastian Pipping
Hello! This release fixes two bugs both affecting 3.4.11 (not earlier releases). Bugs fixed == 351906 Move application of kernel config after make mrproper as that deletes .config (whereas make clean does not) 351909 busybox 1.18.1: Return of mdstart as an applet

Re: [gentoo-dev] genkernel 3.4.11.1 released

2011-01-20 Thread Jeroen Roovers
On Thu, 20 Jan 2011 16:00:06 +0100 Sebastian Pipping sp...@gentoo.org wrote: This release fixes two bugs both affecting 3.4.11 (not earlier releases). I'm a Gentoo developer. I've never used genkernel for private purposes. So I don't see why you would send this to gentoo-dev@ and

Re: [gentoo-dev] genkernel 3.4.11.1 released

2011-01-20 Thread Sebastian Pipping
On 01/20/11 21:08, Jeroen Roovers wrote: On Thu, 20 Jan 2011 16:00:06 +0100 Sebastian Pipping sp...@gentoo.org wrote: This release fixes two bugs both affecting 3.4.11 (not earlier releases). I'm a Gentoo developer. I've never used genkernel for private purposes. So I don't see why you

Re: [gentoo-dev] genkernel 3.4.11.1 released

2011-01-20 Thread Fabian Groffen
On 20-01-2011 21:34:36 +0100, Sebastian Pipping wrote: On 01/20/11 21:08, Jeroen Roovers wrote: On Thu, 20 Jan 2011 16:00:06 +0100 Sebastian Pipping sp...@gentoo.org wrote: This release fixes two bugs both affecting 3.4.11 (not earlier releases). I'm a Gentoo developer. I've

Re: [gentoo-dev] genkernel 3.4.11.1 released

2011-01-20 Thread Rich Freeman
On Thu, Jan 20, 2011 at 3:38 PM, Fabian Groffen grob...@gentoo.org wrote: Like Jeroen, I don't think new package releases should be announced on these developer-related lists. Tend to agree, at least in general. If a genkernel upgrade impacted multiple teams/etc, such as requiring changes to

Re: [gentoo-dev] genkernel 3.4.11.1 released

2011-01-20 Thread Sebastian Pipping
On 01/20/11 21:38, Fabian Groffen wrote: Like Jeroen, I don't think new package releases should be announced on these developer-related lists. It's not about the package, it's about the release itself. I don't send mails on package bumps I do. Sebastian

Re: [gentoo-dev] genkernel 3.4.11.1 released

2011-01-20 Thread Fabian Groffen
On 20-01-2011 21:47:19 +0100, Sebastian Pipping wrote: On 01/20/11 21:38, Fabian Groffen wrote: Like Jeroen, I don't think new package releases should be announced on these developer-related lists. It's not about the package, it's about the release itself. I don't send mails on package

Re: [gentoo-dev] genkernel 3.4.11.1 released

2011-01-20 Thread Sebastian Pipping
On 01/20/11 21:45, Rich Freeman wrote: On Thu, Jan 20, 2011 at 3:38 PM, Fabian Groffen grob...@gentoo.org wrote: Like Jeroen, I don't think new package releases should be announced on these developer-related lists. Tend to agree, at least in general. If a genkernel upgrade impacted

Re: [gentoo-dev] genkernel 3.4.11.1 released

2011-01-20 Thread Jeroen Roovers
On Thu, 20 Jan 2011 21:57:46 +0100 Sebastian Pipping sp...@gentoo.org wrote: On 01/20/11 21:45, Rich Freeman wrote: On Thu, Jan 20, 2011 at 3:38 PM, Fabian Groffen grob...@gentoo.org wrote: Like Jeroen, I don't think new package releases should be announced on these developer-related

Re: [gentoo-dev] genkernel 3.4.11.1 released

2011-01-20 Thread Sebastian Pipping
On 01/20/11 21:55, Fabian Groffen wrote: Unless if you are on some git repo, we have commit mails which can serve this purpose very well. I am on a git repo, and a commit list serves a different purpose: low level tracking of changes. Sebastian

Re: [gentoo-dev] genkernel 3.4.11.1 released

2011-01-20 Thread Sebastian Pipping
On 01/20/11 22:06, Jeroen Roovers wrote: Version bumps have no place on the dev-announce list /unless/ they impact developers' work directly. Fine. (and not because you want to celebrate the glory of another version release). I'm not sure if I'm just interpreting things, but I wish you

Re: [gentoo-dev] genkernel 3.4.11.1 released

2011-01-20 Thread Jeroen Roovers
On Fri, 21 Jan 2011 01:15:19 +0100 Sebastian Pipping sp...@gentoo.org wrote: On 01/20/11 22:06, Jeroen Roovers wrote: Version bumps have no place on the dev-announce list /unless/ they impact developers' work directly. Fine. (and not because you want to celebrate the glory of