Re: [gentoo-dev] gpe-games: new category

2009-07-15 Thread Marijn Schouten (hkBst)
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

Angelo Arrifano wrote:
> Hello all,
> 
> I have the following packages that need a home in the portage tree:
> 
> gpe-go
> gpe-julia
> gpe-life
> gpe-lights
> gpe-othello
> gpe-tetris
> gsoko
> xdemineur
> 
> They are only a few and they won't increase much in the future.
> For this reason I'm reticent in creating the gpe-games category in the
> portage tree as we currently have in the overlay.

So what is this gpe/GPE palm environment thingy?

Marijn

- --
If you cannot read my mind, then listen to what I say.

Marijn Schouten (hkBst), Gentoo Lisp project, Gentoo ML
, #gentoo-{lisp,ml} on FreeNode
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v2.0.11 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iEYEARECAAYFAkpdm4EACgkQp/VmCx0OL2y2CQCfY83dRlPb2yMc5uNpb3EDAyX/
OCYAnjGnNYA+qihTJcndB/sQSIoR9Q5d
=DJhp
-END PGP SIGNATURE-



Re: [gentoo-dev] gpe-games: new category

2009-07-14 Thread Dean Stephens
Angelo Arrifano wrote:
> Moving each game to the games- category would be another solution
> but that would pretty much hide the relation with the GPE Palm Environment.
> 
The gpe- prefix on, most of, the package names should provide a subtle
clue, it could be added to those that lack it. Unless I missed
something, you should be able to package move them in the overlay in
preparation for moving them to the tree.



[gentoo-dev] gpe-games: new category

2009-07-14 Thread Angelo Arrifano
Hello all,

I have the following packages that need a home in the portage tree:

gpe-go
gpe-julia
gpe-life
gpe-lights
gpe-othello
gpe-tetris
gsoko
xdemineur

They are only a few and they won't increase much in the future.
For this reason I'm reticent in creating the gpe-games category in the
portage tree as we currently have in the overlay.

However, I find useful for users to have this category created since it
would allow them quickly spotting another place for games (these games
are targeted to -embedded but work on desktop too) while still providing
the information that they belong to GPE.

Moving each game to the games- category would be another solution
but that would pretty much hide the relation with the GPE Palm Environment.

There is of course another solution, like moving everything into
gpe-base or gpe-utils and STFU.

So fellow devs, I'm evoking your experience powers to help me with this
oh-not-so-important decision.

PS: Please but please, just don't tell me that adding another category
will make a longer "ls -l" output in /usr/portage.
-- 
Angelo Arrifano AKA MiKNiX
Gentoo Embedded/OMAP850 Developer
Linwizard Developer
http://www.gentoo.org/~miknix
http://miknix.homelinux.com