Any objections to globalizing the 'gs' use flag on support for ghostscript?
$ euse -i gs
global use flags (searching: gs)
no matching entries found
local use flags (searching: gs)
On Saturday 17 of March 2007 12:28:42 Steve Dibb wrote:
Any objections to globalizing the 'gs' use flag on support for ghostscript?
I have heard about the magic limit of 5, but whatever...
--
Best Regards,
Piotr Jaroszyński
--
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list
Steve Dibb [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Any objections to globalizing the 'gs' use flag on support for ghostscript?
snip
[-] gs (app-office/rabbit):
Ghostscript support
[-] gs (media-gfx/graphicsmagick):
enable ghostscript support
[-] gs (media-gfx/imagemagick):
enable
If you're feeling ambitious, it might be more appropriate to change that
use flag to ``ps: Add support for postscript'' so that it describes the
functionality rather than the package providing that functionality.
Isn't less ambiguous 'postscript' even better?
Love,
H
--
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org
Michael Krelin wrote:
If you're feeling ambitious, it might be more appropriate to change that
use flag to ``ps: Add support for postscript'' so that it describes the
functionality rather than the package providing that functionality.
Isn't less ambiguous 'postscript' even better?
I was
Steve Dibb wrote:
Michael Krelin wrote:
If you're feeling ambitious, it might be more appropriate to change that
use flag to ``ps: Add support for postscript'' so that it describes the
functionality rather than the package providing that functionality.
Isn't less ambiguous 'postscript' even
