Re: [gentoo-dev] jpeg-mmx is dead

2006-11-06 Thread Matthias Langer 
On Mon, 2006-11-06 at 02:31 -0500, Mike Frysinger wrote:
 On Sunday 05 November 2006 22:42, Matthias Langer wrote:
  however, someone should adapt media-video/mjpegtools-1.8.0-r1
  (see bug 154199)
 
 and someone should search for duplicates before filing bugs

ups ... sorry - i should have looked after closed bugs too.

this should not excuse the fault on my side, as i should have known
better, but:

a close in 48h-button in bugzilla would surely reduce the number of
duplicates in a significant way. in fact, not looking after closed bugs
before filing your own as a user, without cvs access to the tree, is
always risky, as the fix may not yet be distributed to the rsync
mirrors ...

-- 
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list

Re: [gentoo-dev] jpeg-mmx is dead

2006-11-05 Thread Matthias Langer 
On Sun, 2006-11-05 at 02:26 -0500, Mike Frysinger wrote:
 upstream says it's dead and they dont want people using it ... considering 
 the 
 problems we've seen that sounds just peachy

fine ... however, someone should adapt media-video/mjpegtools-1.8.0-r1
(see bug 154199)

thanks,
matthias

-- 
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list

Re: [gentoo-dev] jpeg-mmx is dead

2006-11-05 Thread Mike Frysinger 
On Sunday 05 November 2006 22:42, Matthias Langer wrote:
 however, someone should adapt media-video/mjpegtools-1.8.0-r1
 (see bug 154199)

and someone should search for duplicates before filing bugs
-mike


pgpNoUcD7VsLM.pgp
Description: PGP signature

[gentoo-dev] jpeg-mmx is dead

2006-11-04 Thread Mike Frysinger 
upstream says it's dead and they dont want people using it ... considering the 
problems we've seen that sounds just peachy

p.masked now
-mike


pgpH3TBDRNTHu.pgp
Description: PGP signature