Chris Gianelloni wrote:
On Thu, 2007-07-05 at 18:47 -0400, Mike Frysinger wrote:
you proposing we rearchitect it all or just for testing purposes before going
live ? i can see both ...
I am proposing rethinking all of it. My current thoughts run something
like this:
arch/amd64
arch/ppc (not
On 09-07-2007 11:47:45 -0700, Chris Gianelloni wrote:
> On Thu, 2007-07-05 at 18:47 -0400, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> > you proposing we rearchitect it all or just for testing purposes before
> > going
> > live ? i can see both ...
>
> I am proposing rethinking all of it. My current thoughts run
On Thu, 2007-07-05 at 18:47 -0400, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> you proposing we rearchitect it all or just for testing purposes before going
> live ? i can see both ...
I am proposing rethinking all of it. My current thoughts run something
like this:
arch/amd64
arch/ppc (not ppc/ppc64 or ppc/ppc32
On Thursday 05 July 2007, Chris Gianelloni wrote:
> On Wed, 2007-06-27 at 12:31 -0400, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> > maintaining arch things across multiple operating systems is boring me so
> > i'd like to start moving to profiles that outline arch-specific details
> >
> > for example:
> > default-lin
On Wed, 2007-06-27 at 12:31 -0400, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> maintaining arch things across multiple operating systems is boring me so i'd
> like to start moving to profiles that outline arch-specific details
>
> for example:
> default-linux/parent:
> ../base
> default-linux/sh/parent:
>
maintaining arch things across multiple operating systems is boring me so i'd
like to start moving to profiles that outline arch-specific details
for example:
default-linux/parent:
../base
default-linux/sh/parent:
..
../../arch/sh
arch/sh/parent:
..
arch/parent ->
