Re: [gentoo-dev] "maintainer needed" for app-emul/playonlinux
On Sun, Jul 8, 2012 at 12:53 PM, David Abbott wrote: > On Sun, Jul 8, 2012 at 12:49 PM, Michael Mol wrote: >> I filed bug 425330. Nothing special, I'm just a heavy user and >> advocate of IPv6, and I figured I ought to file the bug locally so >> that the Gentoo dev associated with it can run it up the flagpole to >> upstream. >> >> I just saw that it's now CC'd to "maintainer-needed". I don't like it >> when packages I use lack at least an interested liason between Gentoo >> and the package's upstream. >> >> I'm not a Gentoo dev in any official sense. I've never been a package >> maintainer for any distro. I've just been a Gentoo user for 2-3 years, >> a Linux user for ten years, and a C++-on-Windows dev for the past five >> years. But I'd be interested in giving it a shot. >> >> What's the next step? >> > > Hi Michael, > You could contact the "Gentoo Proxy Maintaining Team" > http://www.gentoo.org/proj/en/qa/proxy-maintainers/index.xml > > HTH, That's what I needed to know, so yes. Contacted, thanks. :) -- :wq
Re: [gentoo-dev] "maintainer needed" for app-emul/playonlinux
On Sun, Jul 8, 2012 at 12:49 PM, Michael Mol wrote: > I filed bug 425330. Nothing special, I'm just a heavy user and > advocate of IPv6, and I figured I ought to file the bug locally so > that the Gentoo dev associated with it can run it up the flagpole to > upstream. > > I just saw that it's now CC'd to "maintainer-needed". I don't like it > when packages I use lack at least an interested liason between Gentoo > and the package's upstream. > > I'm not a Gentoo dev in any official sense. I've never been a package > maintainer for any distro. I've just been a Gentoo user for 2-3 years, > a Linux user for ten years, and a C++-on-Windows dev for the past five > years. But I'd be interested in giving it a shot. > > What's the next step? > > -- > :wq Hi Michael, You could contact the "Gentoo Proxy Maintaining Team" http://www.gentoo.org/proj/en/qa/proxy-maintainers/index.xml HTH, David
[gentoo-dev] "maintainer needed" for app-emul/playonlinux
I filed bug 425330. Nothing special, I'm just a heavy user and advocate of IPv6, and I figured I ought to file the bug locally so that the Gentoo dev associated with it can run it up the flagpole to upstream. I just saw that it's now CC'd to "maintainer-needed". I don't like it when packages I use lack at least an interested liason between Gentoo and the package's upstream. I'm not a Gentoo dev in any official sense. I've never been a package maintainer for any distro. I've just been a Gentoo user for 2-3 years, a Linux user for ten years, and a C++-on-Windows dev for the past five years. But I'd be interested in giving it a shot. What's the next step? -- :wq
