Currently there are quite a few ebuilds in the tree that execute dodoc or
dohtml for files that do not exist. I think it would be nice to have
ebuilds die if this is the case. To not break current ebuilds this would
only happen with FEATURES=stricter.
Sigh... There are already bugs flowing
Diego 'Flameeyes' Pettenò wrote:
On Monday 26 December 2005 03:28, Chris White wrote:
I'm not sure if we're on the same page as far as the target audience of
this change. The target audience is developers/those with strict in their
features.
Actually stricter, and there are way too many
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Jakub Moc schrieb:
|
|Currently there are quite a few ebuilds in the tree that execute dodoc or
|dohtml for files that do not exist. I think it would be nice to have
|ebuilds die if this is the case. To not break current ebuilds this would
|only
Diego 'Flameeyes' Pettenò wrote:
I'm not sure if we're on the same page as far as the target audience of
this change. The target audience is developers/those with strict in their
features.
Actually stricter, and there are way too many people to put that in without
knowing what that do... or
On Monday 26 December 2005 20:01, Jakub Moc wrote:
Currently there are quite a few ebuilds in the tree that execute dodoc
or dohtml for files that do not exist. I think it would be nice to have
ebuilds die if this is the case. To not break current ebuilds this would
only happen with
26.12.2005, 14:28:12, Jason Stubbs wrote:
On Monday 26 December 2005 20:01, Jakub Moc wrote:
Currently there are quite a few ebuilds in the tree that execute dodoc
or dohtml for files that do not exist. I think it would be nice to have
ebuilds die if this is the case. To not break current
On Monday 26 December 2005 13:59, Simon Stelling wrote:
Actually stricter, and there are way too many people to put that in
without knowing what that do... or is it a default nowadays, I'm not even
sure.
You're mixing up 'strict' with 'stricter'.
Well if I'm mixing up, someone moved the QA
On 12/26/05, Diego 'Flameeyes' Pettenò [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Monday 26 December 2005 13:59, Simon Stelling wrote:
Actually stricter, and there are way too many people to put that in
without knowing what that do... or is it a default nowadays, I'm not even
sure.
You're mixing up
and my bad.
I am not yet awake.
It died cause of runpaths on strict, it just showed both, and I wasn't
thinking when I sent earlier email...
On 12/26/05, Dan Meltzer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 12/26/05, Diego 'Flameeyes' Pettenò [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Monday 26 December 2005 13:59,
Moving this to gentoo-dev then.
Original Message
Subject: Re: [gentoo-portage-dev] making dodoc and dohtml die when they
fail and stricter is on
Date: Sun, 25 Dec 2005 15:14:46 -0800
From: Brian Harring [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: gentoo-portage-dev@lists.gentoo.org
To:
On Monday 26 December 2005 08:14, Brian Harring wrote:
On Mon, Dec 26, 2005 at 12:54:04AM +0200, Petteri Räty wrote:
Currently there are quite a few ebuilds in the tree that execute dodoc
or dohtml for files that do not exist. I think it would be nice to have
ebuilds die if this is the
On Monday 26 December 2005 00:32, Petteri Räty wrote:
Currently there are quite a few ebuilds in the tree that execute dodoc
or dohtml for files that do not exist. I think it would be nice to have
ebuilds die if this is the case.
I wouldn't like this.
The reason is, they are also used in
On Monday 26 December 2005 10:26, Diego 'Flameeyes' Pettenò wrote:
I wouldn't like this.
The reason is, they are also used in eclasses that might be generic; while
for example kde eclass checks for the presence of files before dodoc-ing
them, I would rather see it ignore the actually presence
13 matches
Mail list logo
