On 11/08/10 00:08, Krzysztof Pawlik wrote:
On 11/07/10 13:07, Mike Auty wrote:
On 07/11/10 02:40, Donnie Berkholz wrote:
I read it more closely and realized I was a little confused by the way
you listed all the bullet points mixing together benefits and problems.
So I'll try again: if you
On 11/10/2010 07:16 PM, William Hubbs wrote:
On Mon, Nov 08, 2010 at 10:05:17PM +0200, Petteri R??ty wrote:
On 11/08/2010 06:17 AM, Donnie Berkholz wrote:
On 16:42 Sun 07 Nov , Petteri R??ty wrote:
On 11/06/2010 11:22 AM, Krzysztof Pawlik wrote:
Hello,
I'm sending this patch for
On Mon, Nov 08, 2010 at 10:05:17PM +0200, Petteri R??ty wrote:
On 11/08/2010 06:17 AM, Donnie Berkholz wrote:
On 16:42 Sun 07 Nov , Petteri R??ty wrote:
On 11/06/2010 11:22 AM, Krzysztof Pawlik wrote:
Hello,
I'm sending this patch for discussion, what it changes? The change is to
On 11/10/10 18:16, William Hubbs wrote:
On Mon, Nov 08, 2010 at 10:05:17PM +0200, Petteri R??ty wrote:
On 11/08/2010 06:17 AM, Donnie Berkholz wrote:
On 16:42 Sun 07 Nov , Petteri R??ty wrote:
On 11/06/2010 11:22 AM, Krzysztof Pawlik wrote:
Hello,
I'm sending this patch for discussion,
On 11/08/2010 06:17 AM, Donnie Berkholz wrote:
On 16:42 Sun 07 Nov , Petteri Räty wrote:
On 11/06/2010 11:22 AM, Krzysztof Pawlik wrote:
Hello,
I'm sending this patch for discussion, what it changes? The change is to
where
the final clone of repository will be placed, it used to be
Donnie Berkholz schrieb:
On 16:42 Sun 07 Nov , Petteri Räty wrote:
On 11/06/2010 11:22 AM, Krzysztof Pawlik wrote:
Hello,
I'm sending this patch for discussion, what it changes? The change is to where
the final clone of repository will be placed, it used to be
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 07/11/10 02:40, Donnie Berkholz wrote:
I read it more closely and realized I was a little confused by the way
you listed all the bullet points mixing together benefits and problems.
So I'll try again: if you really want to do this change, you
On 11/06/2010 11:22 AM, Krzysztof Pawlik wrote:
Hello,
I'm sending this patch for discussion, what it changes? The change is to where
the final clone of repository will be placed, it used to be
${WORKDIR}/${module}
(where module usually is the last component of source URI) to
On 11/07/10 13:07, Mike Auty wrote:
On 07/11/10 02:40, Donnie Berkholz wrote:
I read it more closely and realized I was a little confused by the way
you listed all the bullet points mixing together benefits and problems.
So I'll try again: if you really want to do this change, you might
On 16:42 Sun 07 Nov , Petteri Räty wrote:
On 11/06/2010 11:22 AM, Krzysztof Pawlik wrote:
Hello,
I'm sending this patch for discussion, what it changes? The change is to
where
the final clone of repository will be placed, it used to be
${WORKDIR}/${module}
(where module
Hello,
I'm sending this patch for discussion, what it changes? The change is to where
the final clone of repository will be placed, it used to be ${WORKDIR}/${module}
(where module usually is the last component of source URI) to ${WORKDIR}/${P}
(essentially ${S}). This has few effects:
- ebuilds
On 10:22 Sat 06 Nov , Krzysztof Pawlik wrote:
I'm sending this patch for discussion, what it changes? The change is
to where the final clone of repository will be placed, it used to be
${WORKDIR}/${module} (where module usually is the last component of
source URI) to ${WORKDIR}/${P}
On 21:30 Sat 06 Nov , Donnie Berkholz wrote:
On 10:22 Sat 06 Nov , Krzysztof Pawlik wrote:
I'm sending this patch for discussion, what it changes? The change is
to where the final clone of repository will be placed, it used to be
${WORKDIR}/${module} (where module usually is the
13 matches
Mail list logo
