On 01 Oct 2015 09:49, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> what do people want to have in place before we move gcc-5.2 into ~arch ?
i want to fix these two bugs (or at least get a better handle on them).
they're related to graphite/ISL, so they don't impact most people.
https://bugs.gentoo.org/555684
On 10/1/15 9:49 AM, Mike Frysinger wrote:
what do people want to have in place before we move gcc-5.2 into ~arch ?
the general list looks pretty good:
https://bugs.gentoo.org/536984
the only glaring issue is the C++11 ABI breakage:
https://bugs.gentoo.org/542482
we already post
On Thu, 2015-10-01 at 10:24 -0400, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> On 01 Oct 2015 10:11, Alexandre Rostovtsev wrote:
> > On Thu, 2015-10-01 at 09:49 -0400, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> > > what do people want to have in place before we move gcc-5.2 into
> > > ~arch ?
> >
> > For one thing, the fix for runtime
2015-10-01 16:49 GMT+03:00 Mike Frysinger :
> what do people want to have in place before we move gcc-5.2 into ~arch ?
>
Just letting know that gcc 5 isn't compatible with clang due to
https://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=23529
Setting gcc as a primary compiler will effectively make programs
no
On 01 Oct 2015 10:11, Alexandre Rostovtsev wrote:
> On Thu, 2015-10-01 at 09:49 -0400, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> > what do people want to have in place before we move gcc-5.2 into ~arch ?
>
> For one thing, the fix for runtime failure in 64-bit wine:
>
> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id
On Thu, 2015-10-01 at 09:49 -0400, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> what do people want to have in place before we move gcc-5.2 into ~arch ?
For one thing, the fix for runtime failure in 64-bit wine:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66838
https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs/gcc?view=revision&revision=
what do people want to have in place before we move gcc-5.2 into ~arch ?
the general list looks pretty good:
https://bugs.gentoo.org/536984
the only glaring issue is the C++11 ABI breakage:
https://bugs.gentoo.org/542482
we already posted a news item when the breakage started in
