-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 06-08-2010 22:54, Markos Chandras wrote:
On Wed, Aug 04, 2010 at 08:47:36PM +0300, Petteri Räty wrote:
On 08/04/2010 08:34 PM, Markos Chandras wrote:
On Wed, Aug 04, 2010 at 07:12:18PM +0300, Petteri Räty wrote:
On 08/04/2010 02:50 PM, Markos
On Sun, Aug 08, 2010 at 11:06:51AM +, Jorge Manuel B. S. Vicetto wrote:
The inactivity of many herds most of the time blocks the work of some other
herds. Isn't council's responsibility to step up and resolve these
interproject issues? It shouldn't be that difficult to ask for monthly
On Wed, Aug 04, 2010 at 08:47:36PM +0300, Petteri Räty wrote:
On 08/04/2010 08:34 PM, Markos Chandras wrote:
On Wed, Aug 04, 2010 at 07:12:18PM +0300, Petteri Räty wrote:
On 08/04/2010 02:50 PM, Markos Chandras wrote:
@Council: Yet another example that we need to track the status of
Hi there
net-proxy/squid needs your love. Bug #311927 and Bug #304751 require a
version bump. Our user community did an excellent job there providing an
improved ebuild for that. Furthermore there are several open security
bugs wrt squid [1][2][3][4]. net-proxy herd what is your status?
Security
On 08/04/2010 02:50 PM, Markos Chandras wrote:
@Council: Yet another example that we need to track the status of every
single project in order to have a clear picture of which projects are
active and which are dead
Pruning projects that don't actively elect a lead would be a good start
On Wed, Aug 04, 2010 at 07:12:18PM +0300, Petteri Räty wrote:
On 08/04/2010 02:50 PM, Markos Chandras wrote:
@Council: Yet another example that we need to track the status of every
single project in order to have a clear picture of which projects are
active and which are dead
On 08/04/2010 08:34 PM, Markos Chandras wrote:
On Wed, Aug 04, 2010 at 07:12:18PM +0300, Petteri Räty wrote:
On 08/04/2010 02:50 PM, Markos Chandras wrote:
@Council: Yet another example that we need to track the status of every
single project in order to have a clear picture of which
