On Sunday 10 April 2005 4:55 pm, Brian Jackson wrote:
How about not breaking apache?
We did not break apache, we broke *binary compatibility* within apache.
Are you aware of *why* we decided to break binary compatibility?
Well, if not, I can say we did so to provide LFS to the end-users.
You
Hi guys,
refering to [1] and [2] I must see, that we've been in testing phase for quite
a long time now. Our eclass' changes reflect only to masked and/or testing
ebuilds, though, marking stable ebuilds somewhat obsolete.
Although, apache httpd is bumping 2.0.54 very soon and our latest
