Re: [gentoo-dev] new UID/GID assignement for dnscrypt-proxy (553)

2019-07-27 Thread Georgy Yakovlev
On Saturday, July 27, 2019 12:41:21 AM PDT you wrote: > Any specific reason for 553? > > I had previously suggested that we stay below 500 as long as there is > space. On the one hand it would match the LSB better, on the other hand > we might at some point want to do dynamic allocation counting

Re: [gentoo-dev] new UID/GID assignement for dnscrypt-proxy (553)

2019-07-27 Thread Ulrich Mueller
Any specific reason for 553? I had previously suggested that we stay below 500 as long as there is space. On the one hand it would match the LSB better, on the other hand we might at some point want to do dynamic allocation counting from 999 downwards, and keeping the fixed IDs below 500 would

Re: [gentoo-dev] new UID/GID assignement for dnscrypt-proxy (553)

2019-07-26 Thread Michał Górny
On Fri, 2019-07-26 at 19:59 -0700, Georgy Yakovlev wrote: > Please review. > Will update wiki[1] page after approval. > > [1] https://wiki.gentoo.org/wiki/Project:Quality_Assurance/UID_GID_Assignment > LGTM. -- Best regards, Michał Górny signature.asc Description: This is a digitally

[gentoo-dev] new UID/GID assignement for dnscrypt-proxy (553)

2019-07-26 Thread Georgy Yakovlev
Please review. Will update wiki[1] page after approval. [1] https://wiki.gentoo.org/wiki/Project:Quality_Assurance/UID_GID_Assignment Best regards, Georgy