All,
The openrc stable candidate is now openrc-0.8.2-r1.
The changes between it and the previous stable candidates are small, so
the news item date and stable request date are still 2011/05/01 and 2011/05/08
respectively.
The more important part of this test is that we need some users to
William Hubbs wrote:
All,
The openrc stable candidate is now openrc-0.8.2-r1.
The changes between it and the previous stable candidates are small, so
the news item date and stable request date are still 2011/05/01 and 2011/05/08
respectively.
The more important part of this test is that we
On Fri, Apr 29, 2011 at 09:22, William Hubbs willi...@gentoo.org wrote:
The more important part of this test is that we need some users to
migrate from baselayout-1 to openrc-0.8.2-r1 and be sure that is
successful.
I migrated a mostly-stable (so baselayout-1) amd64 server to
baselayout-2.0.2
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 04/16/11 18:05, William Hubbs wrote:
ll,
there was a regression in 0.8.1, so 0.8.2 is now the stable candidate.
I propose thatsince the differences between 0.8.1 and 0.8.2 are very
small, we should keep the news item date and stabilization
110418 Marijn wrote:
On 04/16/11 18:05, William Hubbs wrote:
- news item release on 5/1
- stabilization on 5/8.
Please, to avoid confusion, use month names instead of numbers
or include the year so people don't have to deduce the ordering.
Seconded. In fact,
has Gentoo not adopted the
ll,
there was a regression in 0.8.1, so 0.8.2 is now the stable candidate.
I propose thatsince the differences between 0.8.1 and 0.8.2 are very
small, we should keep the news item date and stabilization date from my
original announcement.
- news item release on 5/1
- stabilization on 5/8.
On Tue, Apr 12, 2011 at 09:56:22AM -0500, William Hubbs wrote:
All,
at long last, we have an openrc stable candidate.
This means we need more testers.
We need some people who are still using baselayout-1 to migrate to
baselayout-2 and openrc to make sure that still is successful. Also,
Le 12/04/2011 16:56, William Hubbs a écrit :
All,
at long last, we have an openrc stable candidate.
Thanks to all of you who worked on this over the years, your efforts are
_really_ appreciated.
This means we need more testers.
Openrc being so central to Gentoo, may I suggest a bigger
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 04/13/11 08:52, Rémi Cardona wrote:
Le 12/04/2011 16:56, William Hubbs a écrit :
All,
at long last, we have an openrc stable candidate.
Thanks to all of you who worked on this over the years, your efforts are
_really_ appreciated.
This
On 13:44 Wed 13 Apr , Marijn wrote:
I would be very interested in seeing some kind of list/review of all
the advantages of the new system. Idea for the Newsletter?
We should certainly get a news item together, since this is a huge deal
for Gentoo. Although no doubt non-Gentoo people will
On Wed, Apr 13, 2011 at 07:00:44AM -0500, Donnie Berkholz wrote:
On 13:44 Wed 13 Apr , Marijn wrote:
I would be very interested in seeing some kind of list/review of all
the advantages of the new system. Idea for the Newsletter?
We should certainly get a news item together, since this
On Wed, 13 Apr 2011 07:00:44 -0500
Donnie Berkholz dberkh...@gentoo.org wrote:
On 13:44 Wed 13 Apr , Marijn wrote:
I would be very interested in seeing some kind of list/review of
all the advantages of the new system. Idea for the Newsletter?
We should certainly get a news item
On Wed, Apr 13, 2011 at 07:00:44AM -0500, Donnie Berkholz wrote:
We should certainly get a news item together, since this is a huge deal
for Gentoo. Although no doubt non-Gentoo people will start laughing at
yet another new init system. =)
Openrc is not just a gentoo init system; I know that
On Wednesday, April 13, 2011 08:00:44 Donnie Berkholz wrote:
On 13:44 Wed 13 Apr , Marijn wrote:
I would be very interested in seeing some kind of list/review of all
the advantages of the new system. Idea for the Newsletter?
We should certainly get a news item together, since this is a
On Wed, Apr 13, 2011 at 03:54:24PM -0400, Mike Frysinger wrote:
also, we're still sitting on top of classical sysvinit, so i'm not sure
openrc
technically qualifies as an init system. certainly not a full one.
That's true. Openrc is not really a full init system. It is a set of
init
All,
at long last, we have an openrc stable candidate.
This means we need more testers.
We need some people who are still using baselayout-1 to migrate to
baselayout-2 and openrc to make sure that still is successful. Also, we
need developers to upgrade to openrc-0.8.1 and let us know if there
On 04/12/11 16:56, William Hubbs wrote:
All,
at long last, we have an openrc stable candidate.
Thanks to all who kept chiseling away at this issue - it's nice to see
that we still can get things done, even if it sometimes takes a week or
hundred more than initially planned.
I hope it all
17 matches
Mail list logo
