On Friday 08 April 2005 20:32, Aaron Walker wrote:
> Diego is more than welcome to play around with NetBSD, but officially the
> BSD team decided to worry about getting one flavor working nicely before
> moving on to porting another one.
Actually, as I don't know anything about NetBSD (well, I knew
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Stefan Sperling wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 08, 2005 at 09:22:33AM +0200, Diego Flameeyes Pettenï wrote:
>
>>I was thinking of the virtual for future expansion on NetBSD and other, but
>>this is probably better done using an || PDEPEND when it will be neede
On Fri, Apr 08, 2005 at 09:22:33AM +0200, Diego Flameeyes Pettenò wrote:
> I was thinking of the virtual for future expansion on NetBSD and other, but
> this is probably better done using an || PDEPEND when it will be needed.
That's interesting.
Is anybody planning or working on a NetBSD port of
