Re: [gentoo-dev] pre-GLEP review: Maintainership structure

2015-11-08 Thread Michael Orlitzky
On 11/08/2015 10:53 AM, Michał Górny wrote: > > No. This is going to be PITA to parse, and indefinite recursion is just > wrong. Like you suddenly have to traverse the whole crazy structure to > find a particular project. > That's already true if you want the last project in the file =P You're

Re: [gentoo-dev] pre-GLEP review: Maintainership structure

2015-11-08 Thread Michał Górny
On Sun, 8 Nov 2015 11:02:09 -0500 Michael Orlitzky wrote: > On 11/08/2015 10:53 AM, Michał Górny wrote: > > > > No. This is going to be PITA to parse, and indefinite recursion is just > > wrong. Like you suddenly have to traverse the whole crazy structure to > > find a

Re: [gentoo-dev] pre-GLEP review: Maintainership structure

2015-11-08 Thread Michael Orlitzky
On 11/08/2015 11:07 AM, Michał Górny wrote: >> >> >> Foo >> f...@gentoo.org >> >> > > I meant finding project by e-mail. You don't have to care about > subprojects at all to do this. Subprojects are a side info. > What exactly gets harder? Finding an email address is same in

Re: [gentoo-dev] pre-GLEP review: Maintainership structure

2015-11-08 Thread Michael Orlitzky
On 11/08/2015 02:41 AM, Michał Górny wrote: >> >> If everyone likes and wants to keep the name _sub_project, I think >> _inherit_ is the wrong word to use, since children inherit from parents. > > What do you suggest instead? > Can a project be a subproject of more than one superproject? If

Re: [gentoo-dev] pre-GLEP review: Maintainership structure

2015-11-08 Thread Michał Górny
On Sun, 8 Nov 2015 10:38:17 -0500 Michael Orlitzky wrote: > On 11/08/2015 02:41 AM, Michał Górny wrote: > >> > >> If everyone likes and wants to keep the name _sub_project, I think > >> _inherit_ is the wrong word to use, since children inherit from parents. > > > > What do

Re: [gentoo-dev] pre-GLEP review: Maintainership structure

2015-11-08 Thread Aaron Bauman
On Tue, 2015-11-03 at 23:15 +0100, Michał Górny wrote: > Please review, comment and answer the questions in TODOs ;-). > > [1]:https://wiki.gentoo.org/wiki/User:MGorny/GLEP:Maintainership_stru > cture > A great improvement over the current implementation. Thank you. signature.asc

Re: [gentoo-dev] pre-GLEP review: Maintainership structure

2015-11-08 Thread Aaron Bauman
On Tue, 2015-11-03 at 23:15 +0100, Michał Górny wrote: > Please review, comment and answer the questions in TODOs ;-). > > [1]:https://wiki.gentoo.org/wiki/User:MGorny/GLEP:Maintainership_stru > cture > A great improvement over the current implementation. Thank you. signature.asc

Re: [gentoo-dev] pre-GLEP review: Maintainership structure

2015-11-07 Thread Michael Orlitzky
On 11/03/2015 05:15 PM, Michał Górny wrote: > > Please review, comment and answer the questions in TODOs ;-). > > [1]:https://wiki.gentoo.org/wiki/User:MGorny/GLEP:Maintainership_structure > Much more sane than what we have now, thank you. My only question is about the name of the

Re: [gentoo-dev] pre-GLEP review: Maintainership structure

2015-11-07 Thread Michał Górny
On Sat, 7 Nov 2015 20:45:37 -0500 Michael Orlitzky wrote: > On 11/03/2015 05:15 PM, Michał Górny wrote: > > > > Please review, comment and answer the questions in TODOs ;-). > > > > [1]:https://wiki.gentoo.org/wiki/User:MGorny/GLEP:Maintainership_structure > > > > Much

[gentoo-dev] pre-GLEP review: Maintainership structure

2015-11-03 Thread Michał Górny
Hello, In the last meeting, the Council has decided that the solution to various problems with herds, projects etc. can't be achieved via ad-hoc voting. Instead, a full proposal was to be proposed in form of a GLEP. I have collected the most important points raised during the meeting, and