On 08/12/13 00:44, hero...@gentoo.org wrote:
yac y...@gentoo.org writes:
Shouldn't pkg-conifg --libs handle this?
Oh, good idea. But boost doesn't have pkg-config entries.
Then I see this one, an upstream issue
https://svn.boost.org/trac/boost/ticket/1094
Are you willing to
On Thu, 05 Dec 2013 13:32:09 +0900
hero...@gentoo.org wrote:
Dear all,
I have only one python-2.7 on my system. Simple and stupid.
After boost ebuild is converted to python-r1, libboost_python.so is
renamed to libboost_python-2.7.so. This is all cool about python-r1
for multiple python
yac y...@gentoo.org writes:
Shouldn't pkg-conifg --libs handle this?
Oh, good idea. But boost doesn't have pkg-config entries.
Then I see this one, an upstream issue
https://svn.boost.org/trac/boost/ticket/1094
Thanks.
pgpf7FoU2HZeq.pgp
Description: PGP signature
Dear all,
I have only one python-2.7 on my system. Simple and stupid.
After boost ebuild is converted to python-r1, libboost_python.so is
renamed to libboost_python-2.7.so. This is all cool about python-r1 for
multiple python implementation support.
At the same time, I don't need this feature.
