-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Tue, 12 Aug 2014 10:04:58 -0400
Ian Stakenvicius a...@gentoo.org wrote:
I'm wondering what everyone thinks of having a --nonag option to
repoman and shoving some of the more trivial/style-related repoman
'warnings' into a 'nag' level warning?
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On 12/08/14 09:54 AM, Ian Stakenvicius wrote:
Perhaps we need to have a less-important repoman warning level
(something that can be quieted with a flag) for things like this?
In terms of DESCRIPTION consistency I don't see it being a bad
On Tue, Aug 12, 2014 at 10:04 AM, Ian Stakenvicius a...@gentoo.org wrote:
I'm wondering what everyone thinks of having a --nonag option to
repoman and shoving some of the more trivial/style-related repoman
'warnings' into a 'nag' level warning? IIRC at least one of the QA
team members is so
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On 12/08/14 12:36 PM, Rich Freeman wrote:
On Tue, Aug 12, 2014 at 10:04 AM, Ian Stakenvicius a...@gentoo.org
wrote:
I'm wondering what everyone thinks of having a --nonag option to
repoman and shoving some of the more trivial/style-related
Ian Stakenvicius:
So instead of, for
instance, dropping the DESCRIPTION-ending-in-period check, it could
instead be relegated to a nag that could be hidden with --nonag.
It will still be broken, even if you hide it.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On 12/08/14 01:08 PM, hasufell wrote:
Ian Stakenvicius:
So instead of, for instance, dropping the
DESCRIPTION-ending-in-period check, it could instead be relegated
to a nag that could be hidden with --nonag.
It will still be broken, even if
On Tue, Aug 12, 2014 at 1:13 PM, Ian Stakenvicius a...@gentoo.org wrote:
I don't consider a recommended style message to be 'broken' just
because it's not listed in the devmanual/PMS/etc as a requirement.
The implementation of it, on the other hand, yes that could be broken
and in this case
On Tue, Aug 12, 2014 at 01:25:44PM -0400, Rich Freeman wrote:
On Tue, Aug 12, 2014 at 1:13 PM, Ian Stakenvicius a...@gentoo.org wrote:
I don't consider a recommended style message to be 'broken' just
because it's not listed in the devmanual/PMS/etc as a requirement.
The implementation of
Dnia 2014-08-12, o godz. 10:04:58
Ian Stakenvicius a...@gentoo.org napisał(a):
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On 12/08/14 09:54 AM, Ian Stakenvicius wrote:
Perhaps we need to have a less-important repoman warning level
(something that can be quieted with a flag) for
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On 12/08/14 03:01 PM, Michał Górny wrote:
Dnia 2014-08-12, o godz. 10:04:58 Ian Stakenvicius a...@gentoo.org
napisał(a):
On 12/08/14 09:54 AM, Ian Stakenvicius wrote:
Perhaps we need to have a less-important repoman warning level
(something
10 matches
Mail list logo
