On Wed, 14 Jul 2010 14:16:54 -0500
William Hubbs wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 14, 2010 at 08:48:25PM +0200, Thomas Beierlein wrote:
> > On Wed, 14 Jul 2010 12:27:47 -0500
> > William Hubbs wrote:
> >
> > > All,
> > >
> > > I have recently noticed that our amateur radio applications are
> > > in the ca
On 07/14/2010 03:16 PM, William Hubbs wrote:
I am an amateur radio operator as well, and that is why putting the ham radio
apps in"media-radio" bothers me. Ham radio is not part of the media.
Most of the stuff in the media-* doesn't have anything to do with "the
media" - whatever that is.
M
On Wed, Jul 14, 2010 at 08:48:25PM +0200, Thomas Beierlein wrote:
> On Wed, 14 Jul 2010 12:27:47 -0500
> William Hubbs wrote:
>
> > All,
> >
> > I have recently noticed that our amateur radio applications are in the
> > category media-radio.
> >
> > Amateur Radio is not considered part of the m
On Wed, 14 Jul 2010 12:27:47 -0500
William Hubbs wrote:
> All,
>
> I have recently noticed that our amateur radio applications are in the
> category media-radio.
>
> Amateur Radio is not considered part of the media, so I would like to
> propose renaming this category to app-hamradio, or possib
All,
I have recently noticed that our amateur radio applications are in the
category media-radio.
Amateur Radio is not considered part of the media, so I would like to
propose renaming this category to app-hamradio, or possibly moving the
amateur radio applications to app-hamradio if there are th
