On Tue, 10 Sep 2019 13:31:01 -0500
William Hubbs wrote:
> It looks like we would also need a way to honor the GOPROXY environment
> variable as well.
Or ... mirror://goproxy/
pgpSON8XaRx39.pgp
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
On Mon, Sep 09, 2019 at 06:21:42PM -0500, William Hubbs wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 09, 2019 at 03:57:18PM -0700, Georgy Yakovlev wrote:
> > On Monday, September 9, 2019 2:46:16 PM PDT William Hubbs wrote:
> > > On Tue, Sep 10, 2019 at 08:35:17AM +1200, Kent Fredric wrote:
> > > > On Mon, 9 Sep 2019 12:34
On Mon, 9 Sep 2019 16:46:16 -0500
William Hubbs wrote:
> will list the dependencies of a module, but that doesn't look like it
> can be translated into src_uri format.
If you use the mirror as mentioned in
https://blog.golang.org/module-mirror-launch
Then you should be able to do it in a strai
On Mon, Sep 09, 2019 at 03:57:18PM -0700, Georgy Yakovlev wrote:
> On Monday, September 9, 2019 2:46:16 PM PDT William Hubbs wrote:
> > On Tue, Sep 10, 2019 at 08:35:17AM +1200, Kent Fredric wrote:
> > > On Mon, 9 Sep 2019 12:34:18 -0500
> > >
> > > William Hubbs wrote:
> > > > There is another o
On Monday, September 9, 2019 2:46:16 PM PDT William Hubbs wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 10, 2019 at 08:35:17AM +1200, Kent Fredric wrote:
> > On Mon, 9 Sep 2019 12:34:18 -0500
> >
> > William Hubbs wrote:
> > > There is another option I want to try which is adding "go mod vendor" to
> > > src_unpack for g
On Mon, Sep 9, 2019 at 3:10 PM William Hubbs wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 09, 2019 at 09:00:31PM +0200, Michał Górny wrote:
> > On Mon, 2019-09-09 at 13:41 -0500, William Hubbs wrote:
> > > On Mon, Sep 09, 2019 at 11:19:02AM -0700, Zac Medico wrote:
> > > > On 9/9/19 10:34 AM, William Hubbs wrote:
> > >
On Mon, Sep 09, 2019 at 09:00:31PM +0200, Michał Górny wrote:
> On Mon, 2019-09-09 at 13:41 -0500, William Hubbs wrote:
> > On Mon, Sep 09, 2019 at 11:19:02AM -0700, Zac Medico wrote:
> > > On 9/9/19 10:34 AM, William Hubbs wrote:
> > >
> > > > There is another option I want to try which is adding
On Tue, Sep 10, 2019 at 08:35:17AM +1200, Kent Fredric wrote:
> On Mon, 9 Sep 2019 12:34:18 -0500
> William Hubbs wrote:
>
> > There is another option I want to try which is adding "go mod vendor" to
> > src_unpack for go packages.
>
> Is it infeasible to write a tool that you execute as a maint
On Mon, 9 Sep 2019 12:34:18 -0500
William Hubbs wrote:
> There is another option I want to try which is adding "go mod vendor" to
> src_unpack for go packages.
Is it infeasible to write a tool that you execute as a maintainer, that
simulates
what "go mod vendor" would do, but instead emits a li
On Mon, Sep 09, 2019 at 02:54:51PM -0400, Michael Orlitzky wrote:
> On 9/9/19 2:19 PM, Zac Medico wrote:
> > On 9/9/19 10:34 AM, William Hubbs wrote:
> >
> >> There is another option I want to try which is adding "go mod vendor" to
> >> src_unpack for go packages.
> >
> > If you do that then it w
On Mon, 2019-09-09 at 13:41 -0500, William Hubbs wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 09, 2019 at 11:19:02AM -0700, Zac Medico wrote:
> > On 9/9/19 10:34 AM, William Hubbs wrote:
> >
> > > There is another option I want to try which is adding "go mod vendor" to
> > > src_unpack for go packages.
> >
> > If you do
> On Mon, 09 Sep 2019, William Hubbs wrote:
> There is another option I want to try which is adding "go mod vendor"
> to src_unpack for go packages.
That's pretty much a no-go for a regular Gentoo package, because it
would circumvent checksum verification, and would require network access
at
On 9/9/19 2:19 PM, Zac Medico wrote:
> On 9/9/19 10:34 AM, William Hubbs wrote:
>
>> There is another option I want to try which is adding "go mod vendor" to
>> src_unpack for go packages.
>
> If you do that then it will violate FEATURES=network-sandbox (default)
> unless you also do PROPERTIES+=
On Mon, Sep 09, 2019 at 11:19:02AM -0700, Zac Medico wrote:
> On 9/9/19 10:34 AM, William Hubbs wrote:
>
> > There is another option I want to try which is adding "go mod vendor" to
> > src_unpack for go packages.
>
> If you do that then it will violate FEATURES=network-sandbox (default)
> unless
On 9/9/19 10:34 AM, William Hubbs wrote:
> There is another option I want to try which is adding "go mod vendor" to
> src_unpack for go packages.
If you do that then it will violate FEATURES=network-sandbox (default)
unless you also do PROPERTIES+=" live".
We could add a separate PROPERTIES valu
All,
First off, everything I'm saying here is definitely open to discussion;
they are issues I have found with go 1.13.
with Go 1.13, go modules are the default way to build software written
in Go. If upstream has a go.mod file in their distribution, this
version of Go will assume that they are u
16 matches
Mail list logo
